Literature DB >> 16812049

Conservation, choice, and the concurrent fixed-ratio schedule.

N Shapiro, J Allison.   

Abstract

Five rats got all of their water in daily 60-minute sessions. Two levers and a water spout were freely available throughout baseline sessions. Contingency sessions offered a choice between two alternative fixed-ratio components, in the form of a choice between the two levers. Each component required a specified number of lever presses for access to the spout, and then a specified number of licks for another choice between components. Given the observed relative frequency, the absolute frequency of selecting each component was predicted accurately by assuming that the subject conserved between baseline and contingency the total amount of a dimension attributable to lever pressing and licking. Several quantitative models for predicting relative frequency were examined. The best of these assumed that the subject would show a nonexclusive preference for the component requiring fewer lever presses.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812049      PMCID: PMC1332749          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  PHYLETIC DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1965-06

2.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on pigeons' preference for different fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Implications of the matching law for ratio responding.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The psychological distance to reward.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discriminability of fixed-ratio schedules for pigeons: effects of absolute ratio size.

Authors:  S L Hobson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Timeout and concurrent fixed-ratio schedules with human subjects.

Authors:  S Striefel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Microbehavioral features of nutritive and nonnutritive drinking in rats.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1971-09

10.  The constancy of the energy expended by rats on spontaneous activity, and the distribution of activity between feeding and non-feeding.

Authors:  S D Morrison
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  5 in total

1.  Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.

Authors:  Theresa A Foster; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavior regulation and learned performance: Some misapprehensions and disagreements.

Authors:  W Timberlake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice between fixed-interval schedules: Graded versus step-like choice functions.

Authors:  R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Paired baseline performance as a behavioral ideal.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columbia livia) are sensitive to the distance to food, but only rats request more food when distance increases.

Authors:  Mark P Reilly; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Lauren C Kettle; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 1.777

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.