Literature DB >> 16812665

Choice between fixed-interval schedules: Graded versus step-like choice functions.

R L Shull.   

Abstract

Pigeons chose between two fixed-interval schedules of food reinforcement. A single peck on one of two lighted keys started the fixed-interval schedule correlated with that key. The schedule had to be completed before the next choice opportunity. The durations of the fixed intervals were varied over conditions from 15 s to 40 s. To maximize the rate of reinforcement, the pigeons had to choose exclusively the shorter of the two schedules. Nevertheless, choice was not all-or-none. Instead, relative choice, and the rates of producing the fixed intervals, varied in a graded fashion with the disparity between the two schedules. Choice ratios under this procedure (single response to choose) were highly sensitive to the ratios of the fixed-interval schedules.

Year:  1992        PMID: 16812665      PMCID: PMC1322112          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Choice in situations of time-based diminishing returns: immediate versus delayed consequences of action.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Are theories of learning necessary?

Authors:  B F SKINNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Delayed reinforcement versus reinforcement after a fixed interval.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conservation, choice, and the concurrent fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  N Shapiro; J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement.

Authors:  S E Lea; T J Roper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Paired baseline performance as a behavioral ideal.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Scalar expectancy theory and choice between delayed rewards.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R M Church; S Fairhurst; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preference between variable-ratio and fixed-ratio schedules: local and extended relations.

Authors:  D P Field; F Tonneau; W Ahearn; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.