Literature DB >> 16812036

Effect of varying the duration of grain presentation on automaintenance.

P D Balsam, A J Brownstein, R L Shull.   

Abstract

In a series of three experiments the effects of variation in grain duration on automaintenance were evaluated. In the first experiment, key illumination was followed by grain only when pigeons did not peck the key. Each subject was exposed to 2-, 4-, and 8-second feeder durations in blocks of 10 sessions. Subjects pecked on a high percentage of trials at all feeder durations. The mean peck latency was shorter in the 8-second condition than in the two other conditions in five of six subjects. The conditional probability of pecking given successive keylight-grain pairings did not increase as the number of pairings increased. The second experiment was identical to the first, except that key pecking had no scheduled consequence. Under these conditions, all three subjects showed substantial responding. The recorded measures showed no systematic relationship to feeder duration in this study. In the third experiment, two different stimuli were followed by feeder presentations of either identical (2- or 8-second) or different (2- and 8-second) durations within each session. Subjects tended to respond sooner and with a higher overall rate in the presence of the stimulus associated with the longer feeder duration only when different feeder durations were presented within the same session. This result was confirmed by direct observation of the pigeons. The results of these experiments suggest that the effects of varying grain duration may be small, compared to the effects of varying other variables. The results also suggest that the location as well as the frequency of pecking may be an important measure in the analysis of factors controlling the pigeon's key peck.

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812036      PMCID: PMC1332806          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Maintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentation: the role of the modality of the signal for food.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Centrifugal selection of signal-directed pecking.

Authors:  F J Barrera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Autoshaping as a function of prior food presentations.

Authors:  K Downing; A Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The disruption of autoshaped key pecking in the pigeon by food-tray illumination.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; S B McCracken
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Pavlovian conditioning with heat reinforcement produces stimulus-directed pecking in chicks.

Authors:  E A Wasserman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Conditioned Approach and Contact Behavior toward Signals for Food or Brain-Stimulation Reinforcement.

Authors:  G B Peterson; J E Ackilt; G P Frommer; E S Hearst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Contrast and undermatching as a function of reinforcer duration and quality during multiple schedules.

Authors:  R H Ettinger; F K McSweeney; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Graded differential reinforcement: Response-dependent reinforcer amount.

Authors:  G D Gentry; R T Eskew
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of food-pellet size on rate, latency, and topography of autoshaped key pecks and gapes in pigeons.

Authors:  B O Ploog; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice as a dependent measure in autoshaping: sensitivity to frequency and duration of food presentation.

Authors:  M Picker; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.

Authors:  Adam H Doughty; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.