Literature DB >> 12144310

Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.

Adam H Doughty1, Jerry B Richards.   

Abstract

Experiment I investigated the effects of reinforcer magnitude on differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) schedule performance in three phases. In Phase 1, two groups of rats (n = 6 and 5) responded under a DRI. 72-s schedule with reinforcer magnitudes of either 30 or 300 microl of water. After acquisition, the water amounts were reversed for each rat. In Phase 2, the effects of the same reinforcer magnitudes on DRL 18-s schedule performance were examined across conditions. In Phase 3, each rat responded unider a DR1. 18-s schedule in which the water amotnts alternated between 30 and 300 microl daily. Throughout each phase of Experiment 1, the larger reinforcer magnitude resulted in higher response rates and lower reinforcement rates. The peak of the interresponse-time distributions was at a lower value tinder the larger reinforcer magnitude. In Experiment 2, 3 pigeons responded under a DRL 20-s schedule in which reinforcer magnitude (1-s or 6-s access to grain) varied iron session to session. Higher response rates and lower reinforcement rates occurred tinder the longer hopper duration. These results demonstrate that larger reinforcer magnitudes engender less efficient DRL schedule performance in both rats and pigeons, and when reinforcer magnitude was held constant between sessions or was varied daily. The present results are consistent with previous research demonstrating a decrease in efficiency as a function of increased reinforcer magnituide tinder procedures that require a period of time without a specified response. These findings also support the claim that DRI. schedule performance is not governed solely by a timing process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12144310      PMCID: PMC1284886          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effect of varying the duration of grain presentation on automaintenance.

Authors:  P D Balsam; A J Brownstein; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A quantitative interresponse-time analysis of DRL performance differentiates similar effects of the antidepressant desipramine and the novel anxiolytic gepirone.

Authors:  J B Richards; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Temporal generalization.

Authors:  R M Church; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-04

8.  Discrimination and emission of temporal intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Beyond discounting: possible experimental models of impulse control.

Authors:  J Monterosso; G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  DRL interresponse-time distributions: quantification by peak deviation analysis.

Authors:  J B Richards; K E Sabol; L S Seiden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  24 in total

1.  Effects of reinforcer consumption and magnitude on response rates during noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  Eileen M Roscoe; Brian A Iwata; Melissa S Rand
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  The effect of changes in criterion value on differential reinforcement of low rate schedule performance.

Authors:  Matthew J Pizzo; Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Pamela J Blundell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Validation of a method to assess ADHD-related impulsivity in animal models.

Authors:  Elizabeth Watterson; Gabriel J Mazur; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Motivation and timing: clues for modeling the reward system.

Authors:  Tiffany Galtress; Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Suppressive and facilitative effects of shock intensity and interresponse times followed by shock.

Authors:  Jessica B Everly; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Detrimental effects of acute nicotine on the response-withholding performance of spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar Kyoto rats.

Authors:  Gabriel J Mazur; Gabriel Wood-Isenberg; Elizabeth Watterson; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

8.  Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Stephen C Fowler; Jonathan Pinkston; Elena Vorontsova
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Chronic stress impairs prefrontal cortex-dependent response inhibition and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Agnieszka Mika; Gabriel J Mazur; Ann N Hoffman; Joshua S Talboom; Heather A Bimonte-Nelson; Federico Sanabria; Cheryl D Conrad
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.