Literature DB >> 8583197

Effects of food-pellet size on rate, latency, and topography of autoshaped key pecks and gapes in pigeons.

B O Ploog1, H P Zeigler.   

Abstract

Four pigeons responded under autoshaping contingencies in which different conditional stimuli (red or green keylights) were associated with unconditional stimuli of different magnitudes (large or small food pellets) over successive trials within a session. Both topography (beak opening or gape) and strength (rates and latencies of key pecks and gapes) of responding during the conditional stimuli depended on the magnitude of the correlated unconditional stimulus. Key-peck and gape rates were higher and latencies were shorter in large-pellet trials than in small-pellet trials. Gape amplitudes varied directly with pellet size, although conditional and unconditional gapes were larger than either pellet. These findings were replicated when the key colors were presented either on one or two keys and after reversals of the color-size correlations. Because the unconditional stimulus was varied through pellet size, magnitude was not confounded with food-access duration or quality. These results demonstrate the effects of the magnitude of the unconditional stimulus, in that rates and latencies of both key pecks (which are directed movements toward the key) and gapes (which are independent of the bird's position and key properties) varied with pellet size. Gape measures were unique in that two dimensions (response strength and topography) of a single response class varied simultaneously with magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8583197      PMCID: PMC1350061          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).

Authors:  C C Perkins; W O Beavers; R A Hancock; P C Hemmendinger; D Hemmendinger; J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The associative relation underlying autoshaping in the pigeon.

Authors:  G Woodruff; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effect of varying the duration of grain presentation on automaintenance.

Authors:  P D Balsam; A J Brownstein; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A study of misbehavior: token reinforcement in the rat.

Authors:  R A Boakes; M Poli; M J Lockwood; G Goodall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better.

Authors:  P R Killeen; H Cate; T Tran
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Prehension in the pigeon. I. Descriptive analysis.

Authors:  R Bermejo; R W Allan; A D Houben; J D Deich; H P Zeigler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Falsification of matching theory's account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein's k varies with sucrose concentration.

Authors:  J Dallery; J J McDowell; J S Lancaster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within-session decreases in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; E S Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.

Authors:  B O Ploog
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The principal components of response strength.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S S Hall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Complex dynamic processes in sign tracking with an omission contingency (negative automaintenance).

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

6.  Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Scott S Hall; Mark P Reilly; Lauren C Kettle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Models of ratio schedule performance.

Authors:  L A Bizo; P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-07

8.  Key-peck probability and topography in a concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule with food and water reinforcers.

Authors:  B O Ploog; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.