Literature DB >> 16811512

Rate changes after unscheduled omission and presentation of reinforcement.

D W Zimmerman.   

Abstract

Changes in response rate similar to frustration effects were studied in a two-lever situation. Responding on one lever on a fixed-interval schedule produced access to water for 5 sec and an exteroceptive stimulus. In the presence of this stimulus, responding on another lever on a fixed-interval schedule produced access to water for 5 sec and terminated the stimulus. Occasional omission of a previously scheduled reinforcer after responding on the first lever resulted consistently in increases in rate on the second lever during the immediately succeeding interval. In another procedure, occasional presentation of a previously unscheduled reinforcer after responding on the first lever resulted consistently in decreases in rate on the second lever during the immediately succeeding interval. Changes occurred after the first omissions or presentations and were about the same in magnitude as the procedure continued over several sessions. Typically, an increase or decrease in rate was maintained throughout an entire 100-sec interval. Changes in rate on the second lever of approximately the same magnitude also occurred when rate on the first lever was near-zero under a schedule that differentially reinforced behavior other than lever pressing.

Entities:  

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811512      PMCID: PMC1333837          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.

Authors:  A AMSEL
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Relations between patterns of responding and the presentation of stimuli under second-order schedules.

Authors:  L D Byrd; M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contiguity of briefly presented stimuli with food reinforcement.

Authors:  A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Motivational properties of frustration. I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex.

Authors:  A AMSEL; J ROUSSEL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-05

6.  Reinforcement omission on fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  J E Staddon; N K Innis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pause relationships in multiple and chained fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E K Crossman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Temporal inhibition: effects of changes in rate of reinforcement and rate of responding.

Authors:  E G Carr; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.

Authors:  M G Wessells
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral aftereffects of reinforcement and its omission as a function of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  C Jensen; D Fallon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement omission on temporal go-no-go schedules.

Authors:  J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Partial rewarding during clicker training does not improve naïve dogs' learning speed and induces a pessimistic-like affective state.

Authors:  Giulia Cimarelli; Julia Schoesswender; Roberta Vitiello; Ludwig Huber; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.