Literature DB >> 16811566

Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.

J C Todorov.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a multiple variable-interval 30-sec, variable-interval 90-sec schedule with each component presented alternately for an equal (on the average) duration. This average duration of exposure to each component was varied from 5 to 300 sec. The main concern was with rate of response in the variable-interval 30-sec component relative to rate of response in the variable-interval 90-sec component. In all cases, rate of response was higher in the variable-interval 30 sec component, but the discrepancy in the rate produced by the two schedules tended to be greatest when the duration of component presentation was brief. The mean proportion of responses emitted during the variable-interval 30-sec component (responses in variable-interval 30-sec component divided by total responses) varied from about 0.60 to 0.71, where 0.75 would be expected on the basis of a matching rule, and 0.59 was that obtained by Lander and Irwin (1968). These results are in agreement with data reported by Shimp and Wheatley (1971) from a similar experiment.

Year:  1972        PMID: 16811566      PMCID: PMC1333890          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents.

Authors:  D G Lander; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total
  40 in total

1.  Experimental design: Problems in understanding the dynamical behavior-environment system.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1998

2.  On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  L Charman; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Elicited responding to signals for reinforcement: the effects of overall versus local changes in reinforcement probability.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Positive conditioned suppression: Transfer of performance between contingent and noncontingent reinforcement situations.

Authors:  M Davison; L Sheldon; B Lobb
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The relative law of effect: effects of shock intensity on response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A Bouzas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Contrast and undermatching as a function of reinforcer duration and quality during multiple schedules.

Authors:  R H Ettinger; F K McSweeney; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.