Literature DB >> 12017964

Behavioral contrast redux.

Ben A Williams1.   

Abstract

Behavioral contrast is defined as a change in response rate during a stimulus associated with a constant reinforcement schedule, in inverse relation to the rates of reinforcement in the surrounding stimulus conditions. Contrast has at least two functionally separable components: local contrast, which occurs after component transition, and molar contrast. Local contrast contributes to molar contrast under some conditions, but not generally. Molar contrast is due primarily to anticipatory contrast. However, anticipatory contrast with respect to response rate has been shown to be inversely related to stimulus preference, which challenges the widely held view that contrast effects reflect changes in stimulus value owing to the reinforcement context. More recent data demonstrate that the inverse relation between response rate and preference with respect to anticipatory contrast is due to Pavlovian contingencies embedded in anticipatory contrast procedures. When those contingencies are weakened, anticipatory contrast and stimulus preference are positively related, thus reaffirming the view that the reinforcing effectiveness of a constant schedule is inversely related to the value of the context of reinforcement in which it occurs. The underlying basis of how the context of reinforcement controls reinforcement value remains uncertain, although clear parallels exist between contrast and the effects of contingency in both Pavlovian and operant conditioning.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12017964     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Learn Behav        ISSN: 0090-4996


  48 in total

1.  Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Negative anticipatory contrast and preference conditioning: flavor cues support preference conditioning, and environmental cues support contrast.

Authors:  G A Lucas; W Timberlake
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1992-01

3.  Action at a temporal distance: Component transition as the relational basis for successive discrimination.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Inverse relations between preference and contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An equation for behavioral contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping.

Authors:  P J Durlach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-10

8.  Local contrast in multiple schedules: the effect of stimulus discriminability.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Two types of behavioral contrast in discrimination learning.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral and dimensional contrast in rats.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weatherly; Karyn M Plumm; Julia R Smith; William A Roberts
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-11

Review 2.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research.

Authors:  Eric S Murphy; Frances K McSweeney; Richard G Smith; Jennifer J McComas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Failure to obtain value enhancement by within-trial contrast in simultaneous and successive discriminations.

Authors:  Joana Arantes; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Preference for a stimulus that follows a relatively aversive event: contrast or delay reduction?

Authors:  Rebecca A Singer; Laura M Berry; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reward contrast in delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  Zhijie Dai; Randolph C Grace; Simon Kemp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects.

Authors:  E S Webber; N E Chambers; J A Kostek; D E Mankin; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Operant variability: procedures and processes.

Authors:  Armando Machado; François Tonneau
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2012

9.  The effect of economy type on heroin and saccharin essential value.

Authors:  Tommy Gunawan; Christopher S Tripoli; Alan Silberberg; David N Kearns
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 10.  Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.