Literature DB >> 16811919

Acquisition of the autoshaped key peck as a function of amount of preliminary magazine training.

G D Steinhauer, G H Davol, A Lee.   

Abstract

Three experiments evaluated the effect of magazine training on acquisition of the pigeon's key peck during autoshaping. In Experiment I, pigeons were exposed to two days of extended magazine training, followed on the third day by keylight-only presentations. All pigeons pecked the keylight early in the keylight-only session. Experiment II examined the relationship between the number of magazine-training trials and trials to the first peck. Pigeons were given either 0, 3, 10, or 25 magazine-training trials followed by the standard autoshaping procedure. The number of trials to the first peck was related to the number of magazine-training trials. In Experiment III, pigeons were exposed to the standard autoshaping procedure without prior magazine training. The data from Experiment III suggested that key pecking will occur only after the response of eating from the lighted hopper has occurred. Taken together, these results suggest that initial magazine training is an important variable in autoshaping. Key pecking is discussed as a generalized consummatory response.

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811919      PMCID: PMC1333474          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Controls for and constraints on auto-shaping.

Authors:  J Bilbrey; S Winokur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Acquisition of Key-Pecking via Autoshaping as a Function of Prior Experience: "Learned Laziness"?

Authors:  L A Engberg; G Hansen; R L Welker; D R Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Trace autoshaping: Acquisition, maintenance, and path dependence at long trace intervals.

Authors:  G A Lucas; J D Deich; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of preliminary magazine training in acquisition of the autoshaped key peck.

Authors:  G H Davol; G D Steinhauer; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Blocking, unblocking, and overexpectation in autoshaping with pigeons.

Authors:  Y Khallad; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus generalization from feeder to response key in the acquisition of autoshaped pecking.

Authors:  S E Sperling; M E Perkins; H J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A procedure for autoshaping the pigeon's key peck to an auditory stimulus.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer; G H Davol; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response-Outcome versus Outcome-Response Associations in Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer: Effects of Instrumental Training Context.

Authors:  Kerry E Gilroy; Ebony M Everett; Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-09-01

8.  An open-source device for measuring food intake and operant behavior in rodent home-cages.

Authors:  Bridget A Matikainen-Ankney; Thomas Earnest; Mohamed Ali; Eric Casey; Justin G Wang; Amy K Sutton; Alex A Legaria; Kia M Barclay; Laura B Murdaugh; Makenzie R Norris; Yu-Hsuan Chang; Katrina P Nguyen; Eric Lin; Alex Reichenbach; Rachel E Clarke; Romana Stark; Sineadh M Conway; Filipe Carvalho; Ream Al-Hasani; Jordan G McCall; Meaghan C Creed; Victor Cazares; Matthew W Buczynski; Michael J Krashes; Zane B Andrews; Alexxai V Kravitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Function matters: a review of terminological differences in applied and basic clicker training research.

Authors:  Nicole R Dorey; David J Cox
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.