Literature DB >> 16811349

Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.

M C Davison.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a two-link concurrent chain schedule in which responses on two keys were reinforced according to independent variable-interval schedules by the production of a change in key color. Further responses on the key on which the stimulus change had been produced gave a single food reinforcement and a return to concurrent variable-interval conditions. On one key the terminal link was a two-valued mixed-interval schedule, while on the other, the terminal link was a fixed-interval schedule. When the mixed-interval values were kept constant and the fixed-interval values varied, relative response rates in the initial concurrent links matched relative reinforcement rates in the terminal links when these were computed from cubic transformations of the reciprocals of the intervals comprising the terminal link schedules.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811349      PMCID: PMC1338553          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total
  46 in total

1.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Pigeons' choices between fixed-interval and random-interval schedules: utility of variability?

Authors:  Matthew E Andrzejewski; Claudia D Cardinal; Douglas P Field; Barbara A Flannery; Michael Johnson; Kathleen Bailey; Philip N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Serial conditioning as a function of stimulus, response, and temporal dependencies.

Authors:  W L Palya; R A Bevins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Scaling of stimulus duration by pigeons.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of brief stimuli in second-order schedules of matching to sample.

Authors:  M C Boren
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.

Authors:  R C Mellon; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.