Literature DB >> 16811768

Preference for fixed-interval terminal links in a three-key concurrent chain schedule.

M C Davison, W Temple.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on three-key concurrent chain schedules in which the initial links were variable-interval schedules and the terminal links were fixed-interval schedules. In the first experiment, the initial links were all equal and the terminal-link schedule on one key only was varied. In the second part of the experiment, the terminal-link schedules were all fixed, but different, and the initial-link schedule on one key was varied. Relative response rates in the initial links did not match either the relative arranged, nor the relative obtained, terminal-link reinforcement rates. The relations between independent and dependent variables in three-key concurrent chains were similar to, but not identical with, those found in two-key chains comprising the same schedule types.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811768      PMCID: PMC1333236          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On some determinants of choice in pigeons.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model.

Authors:  M C Davison; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Relative delay of reinforcement and choice.

Authors:  S R Hursh; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A functional analysis of chained fixed-interval schedule performance.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of initial-link length.

Authors:  G R Wardlaw; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents.

Authors:  D G Lander; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; T G Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Fading and errorless transfer in successive discriminations.

Authors:  L Fields
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference in concurrent variable-interval fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of unequal initial links.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of different accessibility of reinforcement schedules on choice in humans.

Authors:  U Stockhorst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of reinforcement context on choice.

Authors:  T C Jacob; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.