Literature DB >> 16812002

Rate and temporal pattern of key pecking under autoshaping and omission schedules of reinforcement.

J D Deich, E A Wasserman.   

Abstract

The role of response-reinforcer contiguity on autoshaped key pecking in pigeons was studied by scheduling response-dependent nonreinforcement at the beginning or the end of brief (8-sec) discrete trials. Schedules that permitted chance conjunctions of key pecking and food sustained high rates of responding, whereas those that prevented the occurrence of key peck-food intervals shorter than 4 sec sustained low response rates. In addition, selective reinforcement schedules supported accelerating or decelerating rates of responding within individual trials. These effects were traceable to response-reinforcer (operant), but not stimulus-reinforcer (respondent) factors.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812002      PMCID: PMC1333604          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcement of behavioral patterns: shaping a scallop.

Authors:  L Hawkes; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Automaintenance without stimulus-change reinforcement: Temporal control of key pecks.

Authors:  J Myerson; W A Myerson; B K Parker
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Matthew T Sitomer; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking.

Authors:  R W Allan; T J Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Automaintenance in guinea pigs: effects of feeding regimen and omission training.

Authors:  A Poling; T Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination and differentiation of response number in stimulus directed pecking of pigeons.

Authors:  P W Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Accounting for negative automaintenance in pigeons: a dual learning systems approach and factored representations.

Authors:  Florian Lesaint; Olivier Sigaud; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.