Literature DB >> 16811564

Some effects of interreinforcement time upon choice.

E Fantino, B Duncan.   

Abstract

Pigeons' responses were reinforced on two identical and concurrently available chain variable-interval-schedules. Unlike the typical concurrent chains procedure, both links were operative throughout, thus producing three types of concurrency: (1) concurrent initial links; (2) concurrent initial and terminal links; (3) concurrent terminal links. Choice proportions in each of these three states suggested that the pigeons were sensitive to momentary likelihoods of reinforcement: choice proportions for a schedule were higher when the schedule had been operative for some time, resulting in a higher probability of reinforcement. The study also showed that the relative rates of responding did not match the relative rates of reinforcement in any of the three states of concurrency. Instead, the choice proportions in both the concurrent initial and in the concurrent terminal links were intermediate between the scheduled and the obtained relative rates of reinforcement, while the choice proportions for a terminal link concurrent with an initial link consistently overmatched the relative interreinforcement times (and were typically 1.00). These data indicate that an accurate characterization of choice may not be obtained by considering only the relative interreinforcement interval where one interreinforcement interval is segmented into a chain. Instead, the organism's choice for a schedule will be substantially lowered by the chaining operation.

Year:  1972        PMID: 16811564      PMCID: PMC1333885          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  A RAPID PROCEDURE FOR GENERATING RANDOM REINFORCEMENT INTERVALS ON VI AND VR TAPES.

Authors:  E F SEGAL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Delayed reinforcement versus reinforcement after a fixed interval.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Interval reinforcement of choice behavior in discrete trials.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Choice and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino; D Freed; R A Preston; W A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Labor supply and consumption of food in a closed economy under a range of fixed- and random-ratio schedules: tests of unit price.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Jamie M Dake; Ellie C Mauel; Ryan R Rowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and segmented interreinforcement intervals.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Psychological distance to reward: A human replication.

Authors:  J P Leung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Paul Romanowich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice, foraging, and reinforcer duration.

Authors:  M Ito; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of reinforcement context on choice.

Authors:  T C Jacob; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of delayed conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules.

Authors:  P Royalty; B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  Delay reduction: current status.

Authors:  E Fantino; R A Preston; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.