Literature DB >> 16811552

Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

V Hollard, M C Davison.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were studied under two-key concurrent variable-interval schedules with food as the reinforcer on one key and ectostriatal brain stimulation as the reinforcer on the other. Brain-stimulation parameters were kept constant while the rate of food reinforcement availability was varied. The results showed that qualitatively different reinforcers could be handled in the same theoretical framework that applies when choice is between different rates, immediacies, and amounts of a single reinforcer.

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811552      PMCID: PMC1333939          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On some determinants of choice in pigeons.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus.

Authors:  A J Brownstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

Authors:  S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  45 in total

1.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Contingency discriminability, matching, and bias in the concurrent-schedule responding of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  Angela Bron; Catherine E Sumpter; T Mary Foster; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Economic substitutability of electrical brain stimulation, food, and water.

Authors:  L Green; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent second-order schedules: some effects of variations in response number and duration.

Authors:  Diane M Sealey; Catherine E Sumpter; W Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings.

Authors:  N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

6.  Practical implications of the matching law.

Authors:  J Myerson; S Hale
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1984

7.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement.

Authors:  S E Lea; T J Roper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.