Literature DB >> 16811504

Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus.

A J Brownstein.   

Abstract

Presentations of grain to three pigeons were determined by two response-independent schedules. Interpresentation intervals varied with a mean interval of 1.5 min for each schedule. Both were concurrently operative, but grain was presented by one only when the chamber was illuminated with blue light and by the other only during amber illumination. A response on a white key, the only key in the chamber, alternated the stimulus conditions and the effective schedule. Grain presentation durations associated with the illumination conditions were varied from 1.5 to 4.5 sec. The proportion of the total session time spent in an illumination condition closely approximated the relative grain presentation duration provided in that illumination. For two of the birds, the proportion of the total number of grain presentations obtained in an illumination condition was an increasng function of the presentation duration in that illumination.

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811504      PMCID: PMC1333803          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response.

Authors:  H Rachlin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  34 in total

1.  Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Noncontingent reinforcement, alternative reinforcement, and the matching law: a laboratory demonstration.

Authors:  Cheryl L Ecott; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

3.  Choice, relative reinforcer duration, and the changeover ratio.

Authors:  R M Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Constituents of response rates.

Authors:  J J Pear; B L Rector
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Time allocation in concurrent schedules: the effect of signalled reinforcement.

Authors:  H Marcucella; G Margolius
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discrete-trial choice in pigeons: Effects of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  J S Young
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

Authors:  V Hollard; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.