Literature DB >> 16811999

Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement.

S E Lea, T J Roper.   

Abstract

Six rats lever pressed for food on concurrent fixed-ratio schedules, in a two-compartment chamber. In one compartment, mixed diet pellets were delivered on fixed-ratio schedules of 1, 6, 11, and 16; in the other, either no food was delivered, or sucrose or mixed diet pellets were delivered on fixed-ratio 8. The number of pellets obtained in the first compartment declined as a function of fixed-ratio size in that compartment in all three conditions, but the decline was greatest overall with mixed diet pellets concurrently available in the other compartment, and least with no food concurrently available. The result is discussed in terms of economic demand theory, and is consistent with the prediction that elasticity of demand for a commodity (defined in operant terms as the ratio of the proportionate change in number of reinforcements per session to the proportionate change in fixed-ratio size) is greater the more substitutable for that commodity are any concurrently available commodities.

Entities:  

Year:  1977        PMID: 16811999      PMCID: PMC1333601          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement.

Authors:  D PREMACK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Ratio requirement and reinforcer effects in concurrent fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  K A Wood; E S Martinez; R D Willis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

Authors:  V Hollard; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Motivation in concurrent variable-interval schedules with food and water reinforcers.

Authors:  R D Willis; C Van Hartesveldt; K K Loken; D C Hall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Ecological determinants of reinforcement in the guinea pig.

Authors:  E Hirsch; G Collier
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1974-02

10.  The post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  M Felton; D O Lyon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. III. A reanalysis of the nicotine regulation hypothesis.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; S T Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  R D Tustin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

3.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The economics of daily consumption controlling food- and water-reinforced responding.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavior regulation and learned performance: Some misapprehensions and disagreements.

Authors:  W Timberlake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice between fixed-interval schedules: Graded versus step-like choice functions.

Authors:  R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The substitutability of reinforcers.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Debra E Freed
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Ethanol regulated preference in rats.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.