Literature DB >> 11936248

Evidence against a constant-difference effect in concurrent-chains schedules.

James E Mazur1.   

Abstract

Savastano and Fantino (1996) reported that in concurrent-chains schedules, initial-link choice proportions remained constant as terminal-link durations increased as long as the subtractive difference between the two terminal-link schedules remained constant. Two experiments with pigeons were conducted to examine this constant-difference effect. Both experiments used equal variable-interval schedules as initial links. The terminal links were fixed delays to reinforcement in Experiment 1 and variable delays to reinforcement in Experiment 2. The durations of the terminal links were varied across conditions, but the difference between pairs of terminal links was always 10 s. In both experiments, preference for the shorter terminal link became less extreme as terminal-link durations increased, so a constant-difference effect was not found. It is argued, however, that this choice situation does not provide clear evidence for or against delay-reduction theory versus other theories of choice.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11936248      PMCID: PMC1284853          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Differences, not ratios, control choice in an experimental analogue to foraging.

Authors:  E Fantino; J N Goldshmidt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

Review 2.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Two- versus three-alternative concurrent-chain schedules: a test of three models.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-07

4.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice: A local analysis.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stimulus control in fixed interfood intervals.

Authors:  William L Palya; Matthew T Bowers
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.