Literature DB >> 16811322

Indifference between punishment and free shock: evidence for the negative law of effect.

R Schuster, H Rachlin.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to respond under two conditions with two identical variable-interval schedules of positive reinforcement. While the schedules operated for separate response keys, they were not available concurrently. During one condition, each response was punished with electric shock. During the other condition, shocks were delivered independently of responding. The punishment suppressed responding but the free shocks did not. However, when allowed to choose, the pigeons preferred the condition associated with the lowest rate of shock regardless of whether or not the shock was dependent on responding. In general, shocks exerted their greatest effect on whichever response had the greatest influence on shocks. In this respect, punishment is instrumental in suppressing behavior and the properties of punishment are symmetrical to those of reinforcement. This empirical symmetry dictates a corresponding conceptual symmetry in terms of a positive law of effect accounting for response increments and a negative law accounting for response decrements.

Year:  1968        PMID: 16811322      PMCID: PMC1338630          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some effects of response-independent positive reinforcement on maintained operant behavior.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; W H MORSE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-10

5.  Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

7.  The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Recovery of responses during mild punishment.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment.

Authors:  W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab under Herrnstein.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Responding maintained under fixed-interval and fixed-time schedules of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  E F Malagodi; M L Gardner; G Palermo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcing the absence of fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Chained schedules of avoidance: Reinforcement within and by avoidance situations.

Authors:  R J Dewaard; M Galizio; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response control with titration of punishment.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The symmetrical law of effect and the matching relation in choice behavior.

Authors:  J Farley; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conditioned suppression, punishment, and aversion.

Authors:  D W Orme-Johnson; M Yarczower
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Performance of humans in concurrent avoidance/positive-reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  H V Ruddle; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; T M Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Human responding on random-interval schedules of response-cost punishment: the role of reduced reinforcement density.

Authors:  Cynthia J Pietras; Andrew E Brandt; Gabriel D Searcy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.