Literature DB >> 16811850

Choice for signalled over unsignalled shock as a function of shock intensity.

J Harsh, P Badia.   

Abstract

Choice between a signalled shock schedule and an unsignalled one was examined at various shock intensities. Three rats were given the opportunity to change from the unsignalled schedule to the signalled one at intensity values between 0.15 mA and 1.0 mA. Steps were usually 0.15 mA and both ascending and descending series were given. For two other rats, shock intensity increased from 0.20 mA to 1.0 mA in 0.20-mA increments; for two additional rats, shock intensity was first 3.0 mA and was then reduced to 1.0 mA. Subjects tended to remain in the unsignalled schedule at the lower shock intensities, but spent most of each session under the signalled schedule at the higher intensities (1.0 mA and 3.0 mA). In addition, the time spent in the signalled schedule tended to vary systematically with shock intensity over at least part of the range of intensity values. It was concluded that the relationship between shock intensity and choice behavior is similar to the relationship between intensity and behavior in procedures involving avoidance, escape, and punishment.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811850      PMCID: PMC1333360          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  22 in total

1.  Avoidance, escape, and extinction as functions of shock intensity.

Authors:  J J BOREN; M SIDMAN; R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-08

2.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled avoidance.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice of longer or stronger signalled shock over shorter or weaker unsignalled shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson; J Harsh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Shock Intensity in Variable-interval Escape Schedules.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; E Winograd
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effects of punishment intensity on squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  D F Hake; N H Azrin; R Oxford
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice of higher density signalled shock over lower density unsignalled shock.

Authors:  P Badia; C Coker; J Harsh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Anticipatory responding and avoidance discrimination as factors in avoidance conditioning.

Authors:  M R D'Amato; J Fazzaro; M Etkin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-05

10.  Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  Shock intensity and signaled avoidance responding.

Authors:  D Das Graças De Souza; A B Alves De Moraes; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A temporal parameter influencing choice between signalled and unsignalled shock schedules.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for signaled over unsignaled shock schedules: Ruling out asymmetry and response fixation as factors.

Authors:  B B Abbott; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choosing between predictable shock schedules: Long- versus short-duration signals.

Authors:  P Badia; B Abbott; L Schoen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Prevention's technology.

Authors:  T P Gullotta
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  1987-09

6.  Choice and the dependability of stimuli that predict shock and safety.

Authors:  P Badia; J Harsh; C C Coker; B Abbott
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice for signaled over unsignaled shock as a function of signal length.

Authors:  B Abbott; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Cathleen C Piazza; Wayne W Fisher; Kristen A Maglieri
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.