Literature DB >> 23862832

Misperceptions of spoken words: data from a random sample of American English words.

Robert Albert Felty1, Adam Buchwald, Thomas M Gruenenfelder, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

This study reports a detailed analysis of incorrect responses from an open-set spoken word recognition experiment of 1428 words designed to be a random sample of the entire American English lexicon. The stimuli were presented in six-talker babble to 192 young, normal-hearing listeners at three signal-to-noise ratios (0, +5, and +10 dB). The results revealed several patterns: (1) errors tended to have a higher frequency of occurrence than did the corresponding target word, and frequency of occurrence of error responses was significantly correlated with target frequency of occurrence; (2) incorrect responses were close to the target words in terms of number of phonemes and syllables but had a mean edit distance of 3; (3) for syllables, substitutions were much more frequent than either deletions or additions; for phonemes, deletions were slightly more frequent than substitutions; both were more frequent than additions; and (4) for errors involving just a single segment, substitutions were more frequent than either deletions or additions. The raw data are being made available to other researchers as supplementary material to form the beginnings of a database of speech errors collected under controlled laboratory conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862832      PMCID: PMC3724775          DOI: 10.1121/1.4809540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Morphological errors in casual conversation.

Authors:  Z S Bond
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.

Authors:  P A Luce; S D Goldinger; E T Auer; M S Vitevitch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

3.  PsyScript: a Macintosh application for scripting experiments.

Authors:  Timothy C Bates; Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-11

4.  Multiple-choice intelligibility tests.

Authors:  J W BLACK
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1957-06

5.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Rutherford Goldstein
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Blythe Vickery; Daniel Fogerty; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.