Literature DB >> 16786183

[Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry].

N Domke1, A Hager, W Wiegand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Corneal thickness and deformation seem to have a considerable influence on intraocular pressure measurement. Due to differences in the corneal deformation in either non-contact tonometry or applanation tonometry, both methods should be compared in the same patient group depending on central corneal thickness.
METHODS: In 106 eyes of 55 patients (18 males, 37 females, age 17-89 years, mean 63.3 years) with glaucoma and central corneal thickness between 409 and 644 microm (Orbscan II pachymetry) intraocular pressure was measured in each eye with non-contact tonometry (Reichert AT550) and 30 min later with Goldman applanation tonometry. RESULT: Non-contact tonometry as well as applanation tonometry showed a positive correlation between measured intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. The steepness of the line of regression was 0.33 mmHg per 10 microm of corneal thickness in non-contact tonometry and 0.17 mmHg per 10 microm of corneal thickness in applanation tonometry.
CONCLUSION: Independently of the large differences in individual pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry, we found higher IOP values with non-contact tonometry in thicker corneas as compared with applanation tonometry. In thinner corneas there was a better correspondence between both methods. Thus, it seems very likely that corneal rigidity increases with corneal thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16786183     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1364-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  23 in total

1.  [Principle and results of a new "non-contact-tonometer" are discussed (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Draeger; K Jessen; G Haselmann
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 0.700

2.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  [Pre- and postoperative non-contact tonometry].

Authors:  M Gräf; V Hessemer; K W Jacobi
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  [Theoretical basis of goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  W Wiegand; B Schroeder; A Hager
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  R C Wolfs; C C Klaver; J R Vingerling; D E Grobbee; A Hofman; P T de Jong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  [Comparative tonometry using non-contact tonometer, applanation tonometer and Schiötz tonometer].

Authors:  S Clemens; R Grewe; P Berg
Journal:  Fortschr Ophthalmol       Date:  1988

8.  The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R A Stein; K Hassanein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 9.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  S Shah; C Spedding; R Bhojwani; J Kwartz; D Henson; D McLeod
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.

Authors:  Jan Luebke; L Bryniok; M Neuburger; J F Jordan; D Boehringer; T Reinhard; T Wecker; A Anton
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  [Are diurnal and nocturnal intraocular pressure measurements over 48 h justified?].

Authors:  N Fischer; F Weinand; M U Kügler; S Scheel; B Lorenz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Methods of measuring intraocular pressure independently of central corneal thickness].

Authors:  A Hager; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].

Authors:  A Hager; B Schroeder; M Sadeghi; M Grossherr; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Intraocular pressure in Japanese diabetic patients.

Authors:  Masato Matsuoka; Nahoko Ogata; Kayako Matsuyama; Tadanobu Yoshikawa; Kanji Takahashi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-02

7.  The influence of corneal density and thickness on tonometry measurement with goldmann applanation, non-contact and iCare tonometry methods.

Authors:  Ahmed Lubbad; Irene Oluwatoba-Popoola; Melanie Haar; Carsten Framme; Anna Bajor
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.029

8.  Intraocular Pressure Measurements by Three Different Tonometers in Children with Aphakic Glaucoma and a Thick Cornea.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Razeghinejad; Ramin Salouti; Mohammad Reza Khalili
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01

9.  Detecting IOP Fluctuations in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Brenda Nuyen; Kaweh Mansouri
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2016-02-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.