Literature DB >> 17587093

[The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].

A Hager1, B Schroeder, M Sadeghi, M Grossherr, W Wiegand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) has been discussed extensively in recent years. The problem, however, has not been solved so far. In addition to CCT there are probably further biomechanical properties that play a role in IOP measurement. We wanted to find out whether these properties are related to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), noncontact tonometry (NCT), or CCT.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Biomechanical properties of the cornea such as corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) can be measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY, USA). Furthermore, a corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc) is given. We examined 156 normal eyes of 80 patients who did not show corneal pathology nor glaucoma. In each eye GAT, NCT, and ORA data as well as CCT were measured. Data were statistically analyzed with respect to agreement and the influence of CH and CRF on IOP measurement.
RESULTS: In our patients the following average values were calculated: GAT 14.8+/-3.0 mmHg, NCT 16.4+/-3.9 mmHg, IOPcc 16.2+/-4.1 mmHg, CH 10.6+/-2.3 mmHg, CRF 10.9+/-2.4 mmHg, and CCT 557+/-36 microm. IOPcc was not related to CCT in normal eyes and the only IOP value related to CH (p<0.01). CRF, however, was related to GAT and NCT values (p<0.01). DISCUSSION: In our group of normal eyes IOPcc, i.e., the value that is adjusted by measurement of viscoelastic properties of the cornea, in contrast to GAT and NCT does not depend on central corneal thickness. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor provide further information about biomechanical properties of the cornea beyond central corneal thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17587093     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-007-1532-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  [Principle and results of a new "non-contact-tonometer" are discussed (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Draeger; K Jessen; G Haselmann
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 0.700

3.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 4.  [Glaucoma diagnostics and corneal thickness].

Authors:  J von Eicken; M Kohlhaas; H Höh
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  P-A Tonnu; T Ho; T Newson; A El Sheikh; K Sharma; E White; C Bunce; D Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  [Theoretical basis of goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  W Wiegand; B Schroeder; A Hager
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.700

Review 7.  [Corneal pachymetry and intraocular pressure].

Authors:  A Hagerb; H Dave; W Wiegand
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.700

8.  Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context.

Authors:  Mohammad Laiquzzaman; Rajan Bhojwani; Ian Cunliffe; Sunil Shah
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  7 in total

1.  Investigation of corneal biomechanics at moderate to high refractive errors.

Authors:  Nehir İnceoğlu; Sinan Emre; Mahmut Oğuz Ulusoy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Authors:  Charlotte Renier; Thierry Zeyen; Steffen Fieuws; Sofie Vandenbroeck; Ingeborg Stalmans
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  [Measurement of viscoelastic corneal parameters (corneal hysteresis) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma].

Authors:  B Schroeder; A Hager; A Kutschan; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Methods of measuring intraocular pressure independently of central corneal thickness].

Authors:  A Hager; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Correction factors for central corneal thickness in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  A Kutschan; B Schroeder; A Hager; H Dave; K Wegscheider; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Intraocular Pressure Measurements by Three Different Tonometers in Children with Aphakic Glaucoma and a Thick Cornea.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Razeghinejad; Ramin Salouti; Mohammad Reza Khalili
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01

7.  Detecting IOP Fluctuations in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Brenda Nuyen; Kaweh Mansouri
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2016-02-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.