Literature DB >> 10857842

Assessment of the diurnal variation in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for patients with suspected glaucoma.

S Shah1, C Spedding, R Bhojwani, J Kwartz, D Henson, D McLeod.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a single daily measurement using ultrasonic pachymetry gives a representative assessment of mean central corneal thickness (CCT) in patients with suspected glaucoma and whether diurnal changes in CCT are related to diurnal variations in intraocular pressure (IOP).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHOD: Central CCT and IOP were measured by a single observer in 56 eyes of 28 patients with suspected glaucoma using an ultrasonic pachymeter and a Goldmann tonometer. Four measurements were made over a 24-hour period: at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure and pachymetry.
RESULTS: Mean IOP was 19.80 mmHg at 8:00 AM (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.95-20.66 mmHg), 20.38 mmHg at 12:00 PM (95% CI, 19.49-21.26 mmHg), 19.91 mmHg at 4:00 PM (95% CI, 19.99-21.83 mmHg), and 19.23 mmHg at 8:00 PM (95% CI, 18.35-20.11 mmHg). Mean CCT was 569.4 microm (95% CI, 560.2-578.7 microm), 567.6 microm (95% CI, 558.4-576.7 microm), 569.1 microm (95% CI, 559.5-578.6 microm), and 567.2 microm (95% CI, 557.9-576.4 microm) at the four respective time points. There was no significant correlation between IOP and CCT in any patient (Pearson rank correlation coefficient); nor was there any significant correlation between the mean diurnal variations of IOP and CCT.
CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with suspected glaucoma, there was no significant variation in CCT. Therefore, a single measurement of CCT is sufficient when assessing patients with suspected glaucoma. There was no correlation between change of IOP and change of CCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10857842     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00090-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  13 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  S Miglior; E Albe; M Guareschi; G Mandelli; S Gomarasca; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Diurnal versus office-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation in primary adult onset glaucoma.

Authors:  Tarun Arora; Shveta Jindal Bali; Vishal Arora; Meenakshi Wadhwani; Anita Panda; Tanuj Dada
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-06-16

3.  Is there any association between primary hyperparathyroidism and ocular changes, such as central corneal thickness, retinal thickness, and intraocular pressure?

Authors:  Husniye Baser; Neslihan Cuhaci; Oya Topaloglu; Fatma Yulek; Nagihan Ugurlu; Reyhan Ersoy; Nurullah Cagil; Bekir Cakir
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Circadian variations in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  P Fogagnolo; L Rossetti; F Mazzolani; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  [Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry].

Authors:  N Domke; A Hager; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Reproducibility of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements in Healthy and Glaucomatous Eyes.

Authors:  Tony Realini; Matthew J Gurka; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Correlation between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure peak and fluctuation during the water drinking test in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Rafael Lacerda Furlanetto; Antonio Carlos Facio; Marcelo Hatanaka; Remo Susanna Junior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  [Measurement of corneal thickness in glaucoma patients].

Authors:  H Dave; A Kutschan; A Pauer; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  [Correction factors for central corneal thickness in Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Authors:  A Kutschan; B Schroeder; A Hager; H Dave; K Wegscheider; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Differences in ocular dimensions between normal and dry eyes.

Authors:  Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno; Manuel Herrera; Franzisco Sánchez-del-Campo; Francisco Martínez-Soriano
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.