Literature DB >> 16778598

Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: evaluating the impact of a direct-to-consumer marketing campaign on physicians' knowledge and practices.

Melanie F Myers1, Man-Huei Chang, Cynthia Jorgensen, William Whitworth, Sidibe Kassim, James A Litch, Lori Armstrong, Barbara Bernhardt, W Andrew Faucett, Debra Irwin, Judy Mouchawar, Linda A Bradley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic testing for risk of breast and ovarian cancer by a biotechnology company on: 1) physicians' knowledge; 2) reasons given when asking questions about the test; and 3) physicians' practice patterns in two pilot cities where the campaign took place and two control cities.
METHODS: Survey of randomly selected family physicians, internists, obstetrician-gynecologists, and oncologists from May 1-May 21, 2003.
RESULTS: Physicians' knowledge did not differ between pilot and control cities. Significant differences (pilot versus control cities) were seen in the reasons patients gave for asking questions about testing. More physicians in pilot cities (14%) than control cities (7%) reported an increase in the number of times they ordered genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk in the previous 6 months (adjusted odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.1). Awareness of professional guidelines and being in a practice with a policy on genetic testing for risk of breast and ovarian cancer were associated with physicians' behaviors and interest among patients in testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity and limitations of genetic testing for risk of breast and ovarian cancer, the development and broad dissemination of clinical guidelines and education of physicians are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16778598     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000223544.68475.6c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  35 in total

1.  Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing: what are we talking about?

Authors:  Meredith Weaver; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Mary B Daly; Hetal S Vig; Frank J Manion; Sharon L Manne; Carla Mazar; Camara Murphy; Nicholas Solarino; Vadim Zubarev
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  What's the harm? Genetic counselor perceptions of adverse effects of genetics service provision by non-genetics professionals.

Authors:  Tracy A Bensend; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Kristin B Niendorf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Media coverage of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  John Lynch; Ashley Parrott; Robert J Hopkin; Melanie Myers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians' genetic testing practices.

Authors:  Jean L Paul; Hanna Leslie; Alison H Trainer; Clara Gaff
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Associations between cancer-related information seeking and receiving PET imaging for routine cancer surveillance--an analysis of longitudinal survey data.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Laura Gibson; Hanna M Zafar; Stacy W Gray; Robert C Hornik; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care.

Authors:  Hetal S Vig; Joanne Armstrong; Brian L Egleston; Carla Mazar; Michele Toscano; Angela R Bradbury; Mary B Daly; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-12

8.  Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Courtney Scherr; Lucia Camperlengo; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2016-08-15

9.  Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  The dawning era of personalized medicine exposes a gap in medical education.

Authors:  Keyan Salari
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.