Literature DB >> 21638197

Media coverage of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

John Lynch1, Ashley Parrott, Robert J Hopkin, Melanie Myers.   

Abstract

Media coverage of Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) genetic testing shapes public perception of such testing. The purpose of this study was to determine and assess the themes presented by U.S. news media regarding DTC genetic testing. We performed a Lexis-Nexis search with the keywords "Direct-to-Consumer" and "genetic test" for news stories published from 2006-2009. The sample was coded on themes of genetic determinism, privacy, discrimination, validity, regulation, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), utility, and cost. Ninety-two news stories were included. Stories displayed moderate genetic determinism and were neutral about validity and utility. Stories indicated that insurance and employers were the most likely sources of discrimination, yet identified the physicians and DTC companies as groups most likely to violate privacy. Stories claimed lack of regulation would harm consumers, but most post-GINA stories did not discuss the law. The costs of tests were frequently included. The results of this study show a broad range of views toward DTC genetic testing and its potential impacts. The genetics community should be aware that the public has been exposed to multiple views of DTC genetic testing when discussing these tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21638197     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9374-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  22 in total

Review 1.  The complex relationship of genetics, groups, and health: what it means for public health.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 2.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Genomic profiling to promote a healthy lifestyle: not ready for prime time.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Muin J Khoury; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Informed lay preferences for delivery of racially varied pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bevan; Jonh A Lynch; Tasha N Dubriwny; Tina M Harris; Paul J Achter; Amy L Reeder; Celeste M Condit
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish?

Authors:  David J Hunter; Muin J Khoury; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Nutrigenomics and ethics interface: direct-to-consumer services and commercial aspects.

Authors:  Nola M Ries; David Castle
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2008-12

7.  Risks and benefits of direct-to-consumer genetic testing remain unclear.

Authors:  Bridget M Kuehn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Nicholas J Schork; Eric J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing--Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Cinnamon S Bloss; Burcu F Darst; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Jenny Ostergren
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2013-09

3.  Direct to consumer genetic testing-law and policy concerns in Ireland.

Authors:  Aisling de Paor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Authors:  Alexandra Cernat; Naazish S Bashir; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  Parental Perception of Self-Empowerment in Pediatric Pharmacogenetic Testing: The Reactions of Parents to the Communication of Actual and Hypothetical CYP2D6 Test Results.

Authors:  Sarah Adelsperger; Cynthia A Prows; Melanie F Myers; Cassandra L Perry; Ariel Chandler; Ingrid A Holm; John A Lynch
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-08-30

6.  Characteristics of genetics-related news content in Black weekly newspapers.

Authors:  C A Caburnay; P Babb; K A Kaphingst; J Roberts; S Rath
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  A randomized trial of genetic information for personalized nutrition.

Authors:  Daiva E Nielsen; Ahmed El-Sohemy
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 5.523

8.  Public reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic health tests: A comparison across the US, UK, Japan and Australia.

Authors:  Jan Charbonneau; Dianne Nicol; Don Chalmers; Kazuto Kato; Natsuko Yamamoto; Jarrod Walshe; Christine Critchley
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.351

9.  Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA.

Authors:  Joshua Prudent; Esthermarie Lopez; Donna Dorshorst; Hannah C Cox; Joann N Bodurtha
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 10.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Sara Rubinelli; Elisabetta Ceretti; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.