Literature DB >> 16724782

Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.

Darryl W Schneider1, Gordon D Logan.   

Abstract

Explicitly cued task switching with multiple cues per task permits three types of transitions: cue repetitions (cue and task repeat), task repetitions (cue changes but task repeats), and task alternations (cue and task change). The difference between task alternations and task repetitions can be interpreted as a switch cost, but its magnitude varies substantially across experiments. We investigated how switch cost is affected by transition frequency (how often subjects repeat and switch tasks) with an experiment in which each transition had a frequency of .70 in separate sessions. Switch cost was smallest when task alternations were frequent and largest when task repetitions were frequent. Mathematical modeling of the data indicated that the different "switch costs" reflected priming of cue encoding for frequent transitions. Interpretations of our findings based on automatic priming from memory retrieval of past transitions and strategic priming from transition expectancies are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16724782     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Hilde Haider; Rainer H Kluwe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Task switching.

Authors:  Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

6.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

7.  Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches.

Authors:  Stephen Monsell; Petroc Sumner; Helen Waters
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

8.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations.

Authors:  P Sudevan; D A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Component processes in task switching.

Authors:  N Meiran; Z Chorev; A Sapir
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

2.  Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Task switching among two or four tasks: effects of a short-term variation of the number of candidate tasks.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Juliane Scheil
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  What it costs to implement a plan: plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

5.  Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-27

7.  Task frequency influences stimulus-driven effects on task selection during voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Kaitlin M Reiman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

8.  Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.

Authors:  Victor Mittelstädt; Jeff Miller; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

9.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.