Literature DB >> 12776747

Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.

Ulrich Mayr1, Reinhold Kliegl.   

Abstract

A task-switching paradigm with a 2:1 mapping between cues and tasks was used to separate cue-switching processes (indexed through pure cue-switch costs) from actual task-switching processes (indexed through additional costs in case of cue and task changes). A large portion of total switch costs was due to cue changes (Experiments 1 and 2), and cue-switch costs but not task-switch costs were sensitive to effects of practice (Experiment 1) and preparation (Experiment 2). In contrast, task-switch costs were particularly sensitive to response-priming effects (Experiments 1 and 2) and task-set inhibition (Experiment 3). Results suggest two processing stages relevant during task-set selection: cue-driven retrieval of task rules from long-term memory and the automatic application of rules to a particular stimulus situation.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12776747     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  89 in total

1.  The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

Review 2.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

5.  Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.

Authors:  Nadja R Ging-Jehli; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-07-27

6.  Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

7.  On the role of verbalization during task set selection: switching or serial order control?

Authors:  Richard L Bryck; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

8.  Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

9.  Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Bernhard Hommel; Alan Allport
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

10.  Extensive practice does not eliminate human switch costs.

Authors:  Gijsbert Stoet; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.