The Wnt-dependent signaling pathways as target in oncology drug discovery.

Our current understanding of the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways is mainly based on studies performed in a number of model organisms including, Xenopus, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and mammals. These studies clearly indicate that the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways are conserved through evolution and control many events during embryonic development. Wnt pathways have been shown to regulate cell proliferation, morphology, motility as well as cell fate. The increasing interest of the scientific community, over the last decade, in the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways is supported by the documented importance of these pathways in a broad range of physiological conditions and disease states. For instance, it has been shown that inappropriate regulation and activation of these pathways is associated with several pathological disorders including cancer, retinopathy, tetra-amelia and bone and cartilage disease such as arthritis. In addition, several components of the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways appear to play important roles in diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and in the emerging field of stem cell research. In this review, we wish to present a focused overview of the function of the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways and their role in oncogenesis and cancer development. We also want to provide information on a selection of potential drug targets within these pathways for oncology drug discovery, and summarize current data on approaches, including the development of small-molecule inhibitors, that have shown relevant effects on the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways.

Introduction

The Wnt-dependent signaling pathways comprise several branches whose differential activation depends on the specificity of the Wnt ligands and Frizzled (Fzd) isoforms involved, as well as the cellular context. These pathways and their implication in several disease states have attracted a lot of interest, both from academia and the pharmaceutical industry, due mainly to the fact that components of these pathways may act as good targets for drug discovery. In this review, we will discuss the recent progress in understanding the regulation of the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways and their physiological role in human cancer, as well as present some perspectives on the therapeutic potential provided by targeted intervention of the Wnt pathways, including the development of small molecule inhibitors of the Wnt pathways in oncology drug discovery research.

Overview of the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways

The Wnt-dependent signaling pathways encompass three different molecular pathways downstream of Wnt/Fzd interaction. The majority of published research on Wnt signaling has been focused on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which regulates cell fate determination by regulating gene expression. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is also referred to as the “canonical” Wnt pathway. The Wnt/Ca2+ and Wnt/polarity (also known as Planar Cell Polarity, PCP) pathways are known as the “non-canonical pathways”, and the identity of the components of both these pathways has been unclear until recently. The intracellular signal transduction cascades that have been identified in each of these pathways are very different from each other, but the common initial step is the binding of a Wnt ligand to the cognate Fzd receptor. Depending on the pathway which is activated, the initiation signal will be transduced differently. This decision most likely depends on which Wnt ligand and FZD receptor are present, as well as the cellular context. Nineteen Wnt ligands and 10 different members of the Fzd seven-transmembrane receptor family have been described in the human genome (http://www.stanford.edu/~rnusse/wntwindow.html). Consequently, a large variety of responses could be initiated from Wnt/Fzd interactions.

The different Wnt ligands have been classified into two functional groups. The first group, referred to as the protooncogenic or transforming group (e.g., Wnt1, -3A, -8 and -8B), induce a secondary axis in early Xenopus embryos [1] and transform C57MG mammary epithelial cells [2, 3] when ectopically expressed. In general, this group can activate the β-catenin pathway. The second group (e.g., Wnt4, -5A and -11) do not elicit axis duplication in Xenopus embryos [1] and cannot transform C57MG cells [3]. However, these Wnts alter cell movements and reduce cell adhesion when over-expressed in Xenopus embryos [1, 4]. These Wnts can activate the non-canonical Wnt pathways, as well as antagonize the activity of the transforming Wnts [5]. This classification is not exclusive, for instance, Wnt5a has been shown to activate non-canonical pathways, but when co-expressed with Fzd5, it can induce axis duplication (canonical pathway) [6].

Fzd receptors can be classified into several groups based on their basal signaling activity when ectopically expressed in Xenopus. In this context, in the absence of ectopic ligand, members of the Fzd family preferentially activate either the β-catenin or the Ca2+ pathway [7]. As shown in Figure 1, there are 4 families of Wnt antagonists that can be divided into two sub-groups according to their mode of action. The first group includes the secreted-Frizzled related protein (sFRP) family, Wnt-inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1), and Cerberus. They inhibit Wnt signaling by direct binding to Wnt molecules. The second group, consisting of the Dickkopf (DKK) family, inhibits Wnt signaling by binding to the LRP5/LRP6 component of the Wnt receptor complex [8].

Figure 1

Schematic overview of the Wnt signaling pathways. In the absence of active Wnt (left) β-catenin is degraded and Tcf/Lef transcription factors act as repressor. When a Wnt signal is present (right) β-catenin accumulates in the cytoplasm, localizes then to the nucleus, and activates transcription together with Tcf/Lef transcription factors.

The Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been extensively studied in different vertebrate and invertebrate model systems and it was shown that β-catenin is the central molecule. The pathway requires an additional single-pass transmembrane protein, known as LRP5 or LRP6 from the low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, to function as an obligate co-receptor of the seven-transmembrane Fzd receptors for transducing the Wnt signal [9-11]. The amino-termini of LRP and FZD were reported to associate only in the presence of Wnt [12], implying that Wnt ligands form a trimeric complex with an LRP and FZD receptor. However, it was recently reported that LRPs activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by binding to Axin in a disheveled (Dvl) independent manner, while Fzd receptors transduce Wnt signals through Dvl to stabilize β-catenin [13]. It is thus possible that Wnt proteins form separate complexes with Fzd receptors and LRPs, transducing the signals separately, but converging downstream in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. The current model of Wnt/β-catenin activation starts with the binding of Wnt to a receptor complex encompassing a Fzd receptor and LRP co-receptor. The biochemical mechanisms by which the binding of the Wnt ligand to its cognate Fzd receptor elicits signal transduction within the cell are poorly characterized. After Wnt binding, Dvl is phosphorylated and through its association with Axin, prevents glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) and casein kinase 1α (CK1α) from phosphorylating critical substrates, including β-catenin. Phosphorylation of β-catenin at the N-terminus by CK1α and GSK3β is essential for its targeted degradation [14]. Non-phosphorylated β-catenin escapes recognition by β-Transducin repeat Containing Protein (β-TrCP), a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, thereby avoiding degradation. This non-phosphorylated form of β-catenin is then able to localize to the nucleus [15], form a complex with Tcf/Lef transcription factors and co-activators such as (CREB Binding Protein, CBP) [16, 17] and induce the expression of downstream target genes (see http://www.stanford.edu/~rnusse/wntwindow.html). Although Tcf/Lef directly bind to DNA through their HMG domains, they are incapable of independently activating gene transcription [18]. β-catenin is the additional co-activator required for transcriptional activation [19] together with other co-activators such as CBP [20]. In the absence of a Wnt/Fzd signal, β-catenin is phosphorylated by GSK3β and CK1α, subsequently ubiquinated and rapidly degraded by the proteasome. β-catenin levels will not be able to accumulate in the nucleus, and Tcf/Lef proteins will act as transcriptional repressor, mediated through the interaction of Tcf/Lef with at least two different gene products, Groucho and C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP) [17, 21–23].

Signaling through the Wnt/Ca2+pathway is independent of β-catenin. The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway regulates cell adhesion and motility [24], and is mediated through release of intracellular Ca2+ upon Wnt stimulation, and involves activation of protein kinase C (PKC) and calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CamKII) [25-27], leading to the regulation of the Ca2+-responsive transcription factor NF-AT [28, 29]. Wnt-5a was the first Wnt ligand identified to signal down this pathway and was shown to require coupling to G-proteins [26, 30]. Interestingly, the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway activated by Wnt-5a, antagonizes the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [1, 5, 29, 31]. One mechanism of inhibition is via CamKII. CamKII will activate the MAP kinase-related Nemo-like kinase (NLK), which will phosphorylate Tcf transcription factors, which will prevent β-catenin/Tcf-mediated transcription [31, 32]. In addition, PKC, activated by the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway, has been shown to block the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by phosphorylating Dvl [33].

In the Wnt/polarity pathway, referred to as the Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) pathway in Drosophila, Fzd functions to establish asymmetric cell polarities and coordinate cell shape changes and cellular movement. Much of the current understanding of the molecules governing this pathway has come from studies in Drosophila as several clear effects of the PCP pathway, such as hair follicle and bristle orientation, can be readily assessed in this organism. In addition, the existence of mutant genes that affect planar polarized structures in Drosophila have been exploited to study the processes governing PCP. In this pathway, Fzd regulates the activity of the small GTPases Rho and Rac through different domains of Dvl. Rho and Rac, in turn, regulate the activity of Rock and Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) respectively [34-36]. PCP was recently demonstrated in a mammalian system—mammalian cochlea—in which the PCP pathway initiated by Wnt7a governs the unidirectional orientation of sensory hair cells necessary for unimpaired hearing [37]. The PCP pathway is also involved in regulating cell polarization during vertebrate gastrulation movements [5, 36, 38, 39] in which activation of both Rho and Rac are required for convergent extension [36]. Thus, although differences exist between vertebrate and invertebrate pathways, the core components of the pathway are conserved through evolution.

Implication of Wnt-dependent signaling pathways in Oncology

The first Wnt (at that time still known as int1) was discovered more than 20 years ago [40], as a proto-oncogene in mammary tumors activated by integration of the mouse mammary tumor virus. Since then, more studies have linked the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways to oncogenesis and cancer development. While the Wnt pathways have been the focus of a great deal of experimentation with increasing number of reports and publications every year, a number of questions still remain to be answered. As the downstream components were identified, more studies have found evidence linking the different components of these pathways to cancer [41-44] as well as other indications (Table 1).

Table 1

Wnt-dependent signaling pathway components involved in diseases and syndromes (adapted from [185])

Gene	Disease	Mutation or activity/expression change	Reference
Wnt(s)	Cancer	Elevated	[47, 186]
Wnt5a	Cancer/metastasis	Elevated	[51]
sFRP(s)	Cancer	Variable	[55, 56, 59]
WIF-1	Cancer	Reduced	[63]
LRP5	Osteosarcoma	Elevated	[68]
Fzd(s)	Cancer	Elevated	[187]
β-catenin	Cancer	Gain of function	[41]
APC	Cancer	Loss of function/reduced	[78, 79]
Axin	Cancer	Loss of function	[83]
GSK3β	Cancer	Deregulated	[188, 189]
Wnt1	Schizophrenia	Elevated	[190]
GSK3β	Schizophrenia	Variable	[191]
Fzd3	Schizophrenia	SNP	[192]
Wnt1	Rheumatoid arthritis	Elevated	[193]
Wnt5a	Rheumatoid arthritis	Elevated	[193, 194]
Fzd5	Rheumatoid arthritis	Elevated	[193, 194]
sFRP3	Osteoarthritis	SNP/reduced	[195]
LRP5	Low bone mass	Loss of function	[69]
LRP5	High bone mass	Gain of function	[70, 196]
Wnt3	Tetra-amelia	Loss of function	[197]
Fzd4	FEVR	Loss of function	[198]
LRP5	FEVR	Loss of function	[199]
Wnt4	Intersex	Variable	[200, 201]

APC: adenomatous polyposis coli; FEVR: familial exudative vitreoretinopathy; Fzd: Frizzled; GSK3β: glycogen synthase kinase 3β; LRP: LDL-receptor-related protein; sFRP: secreted Frizzled related protein; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; WIF: Wnt inhibitory factor.

Definitive proof of the involvement of Wnts in human cancer has been lacking for years. There have been numerous reports describing either over-expression or, sometimes, under-expression of Wnt genes in human cancers, but mRNA expression levels can at best be correlative. A transgenic mouse model has recently shown that tumor growth is dependent on Wnt-1 expression [45]. Studies of Wnt expression in human breast tumors have tended to support a role for Wnt signaling in the development of breast cancer [46-50]. Wnt5a signaling has also been shown to directly affect cell motility and invasion of metastatic melanoma. Blocking this pathway using antibodies to Fzd5, a receptor for Wnt5a, was shown to inhibit PKC activity and cellular invasion. Furthermore, Wnt5a expression in human melanoma biopsies directly correlated with increasing tumor grade [51]. More compelling evidence, such as amplification, rearrangements, or mutation of genes encoding Wnt ligands or receptors has thus far not been identified. Chen and colleagues showed that cells expressing Wnt1 were resistant to cancer therapy mediated apoptosis.Wnt1 signaling inhibited cytochrome c release and the subsequent caspase-9 activation that was induced by chemotherapeutic drugs, including both vincristine and vinblastine. Further research showed that Wnt1 signaling inhibited apoptosis by activating β-catenin/Tcf mediated transcription [52]. It was recently demonstrated that inhibition of Wnt2 mediated signaling induced apoptosis in both malignant melanoma cells and non-small-cell lung cancer cells [53, 54]. These studies show that activation of the β-catenin/Tcf signaling pathway by Wnt ligands not only provides a growth advantage to cancer cells, but also significantly affects the clinical outcome by inhibiting chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Blocking Wnt signaling, for instance with a monoclonal antibody or development of small molecules can be useful to inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway for treatment of cancer patients and may improve the efficacy of chemotherapy by enhancing apoptosis in cancer cells.

The Wnt signaling pathway antagonists have also been studied extensively in developmental studies and their involvement in oncogenesis was recently demonstrated. Loss of expression of sFRP1 was reported in bladder cancer [55], and down-regulation of family members has been reported in cervical carcinomas [56], breast cancers [57], and gastric cancers [58], whilst the promoters of several sFRP family members have been shown to be hypermethylated in colorectal tumors [59-61]. WIF-1 downregulation was recently reported by Wissman and colleagues in several cancer types including lung cancer [62] and it was shown that WIF-1 was frequently silenced by hypermethylation of its promoter in lung cancer cell lines as well as in fresh lung cancer tissues [63].

Both Fzd and its co-receptor LRP have also been implicated in carcinogenesis although clear proof is lacking. Expression studies for the Fzd genes have indicated that aberrant expression of these genes is involved in human cancer [7, 46, 49, 58, 64–67], and LRP5 was identified as a possible marker for disease progression in high-grade osteosarcoma [68]. The presence of LRP5 correlated significantly with tumor metastasis and the chondroblastic subtype of osteosarcoma. Patients with LRP5 expression in the tumor showed decreased event free survival. In addition, mutations in LRP5 have been linked to diseases with significant skeletal abnormalities [69, 70].

The most compelling evidence implicating the Wnt signaling pathway in carcinogenesis is the observation that β-catenin functions as an oncogene in different cancers, while APC and Axin act as tumor suppressor genes. Mutations in the β-catenin gene, affecting the aminoterminal region of the protein, increase the stability of the β-catenin gene. These mutations affect specific serine and threonine residues, which are sites for priming by CK1 (Ser 45) and further phosphorylation by GSK3β (Ser 33, 37 and Thr 41) and are essential for the recognition by β-TrCP, marking β-catenin for degradation [71]. Somatic mutations in the amino-terminal region of the β-catenin gene have been described in a wide variety of human cancers, including colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, pancreatic, hepatocellular, prostate, gastric and thyroid carcinoma, desmoid tumor, hepatoblastoma, medulloblastoma, melanoma, pilomatricoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and Wilms’ tumor [41].

Both APC and Axin have a regulatory function in the Wnt signaling pathway, and both have been shown to be critical for the down-regulation of β-catenin [72-74]. It has been proposed that Axin and APC facilitate the phosphorylation of β-catenin by GSK3β [75-76]. About 80% of sporadic colorectal carcinomas and cell lines derived from these tumors harbor mutations in the APC gene [77, 78], Most of them are nonsense or frame shift mutations leading to a truncated APC protein. About 60% of these mutations are clustered in a 700 bp “mutation cluster region” corresponding to the β-catenin/Axin-binding domain. Apart from APC mutations, hypermethylation of the APC promoter at CpG sites was also detected in colorectal cancer [79], which may thus constitute an alternative mechanism for APC gene inactivation. Beside the important role of APC in regulating β-catenin levels, it has additional functions through its binding and stabilization of microtubules [80], and truncation of the APC gene could lead to chromosomal instability, which is a hallmark of colorectal cancer [81, 82]. The high prevalence of APC mutations in colorectal cancers makes identification of these mutations a worthwhile strategy for diagnosis and early detection of colorectal carcinomas. Axin has also been shown to be mutated in hepatocellular cancer and the derivative cell lines [83]. All of the mutations were predicted to truncate the Axin protein in a manner that eliminated the β-catenin binding sites, and thus preventing Axin from facilitating β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation.

Finally, all previously discussed aberrations and mutations in components of the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways lead to activation of Tcf/Lef target genes by β-catenin. A considerable number of target genes have been identified (see Wnt homepage for a complete list) and play a role in development and tumorigenesis. Several of the target genes have functions in cell cycle, apoptosis, proliferation, transcription and are involved in tumor progression. The first identified target genes were c-Myc and cyclin D1 [84, 85] through which Wnt signaling may stimulate progression through the cell cycle. Other target genes that have been identified include, for instance, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Wnt-1 induced secreted protein 1 (WISP-1), Bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 7 and 26. The list of downstream target genes will undoubtedly be extended and it will be interesting to elucidate the relevance of these genes for human cancers.

As discussed, many genes in this pathway have been implicated in neoplasia through mutations (APC, Axin, β-catenin), and several other components through upor downregulated expression. However, variations in expression levels (up- and downregulation) are also found in normal cells at different stages of development. Since the Wnt signaling pathway is crucial for normal development, the expression level of the different genes in adult tissues can be considered as relevant for cancer research. With the advent of high-throughput methods that evaluate gene-expression in tumors [86-88], the discovery of genes that are differentially expressed has been increasing exponentially. The information gained from these studies has proven promising for the development of diagnostic assays, particularly for prognosis, but the utility of a gene as a cancer diagnostic does not necessarily reflect a causative role in the process [89]. In the absence of mutational evidence, functional evidence obtained from studies in vitro or in non-human species in vivo must be used. Levels of gene expression are thus unreliable indicators of causation because disturbance of any network invariably leads to a multitude of such changes only peripherally related to the phenotype [90]. Taken together, it is apparent that aberrant Wnt signaling can cause cancer and that tumor promotion by this pathway can proceed through different genetic defects that occur at several stages of this pathway. Many different types of cancer, in different tissues, have been linked to alterations in the Wnt signaling pathway and it is thus not surprising that oncology is the main disease area where antagonists of this pathway could be of use.

Existing therapies with non-specific effects on Wnt-dependent signaling pathways

As a result of all the evidence implicating Wnt signaling in the pathophysiology of many human diseases, including cancer, interest in the development of Wnt signaling inhibitors has increased substantially. Different components of these signaling pathways can be regarded as useful targets in preventing and treating cancer, and several therapeutic approaches currently being exploited may already be linked to Wnt pathways, although their actual mechanism of action remain unclear. The development of new targeted anticancer agents is based on the premise that the drug modulates a specific molecular target. These targets may be critical to cancer cell survival or may be a regulatory pathway not used in normal cells. In the next sections, we will discuss a number of therapies that have a non-specific effect on the Wnt signaling pathways.

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)—such as aspirin, indomethacin and sulindac—have been demonstrated to act as anti-tumor agents [91, 92]. Regular use of NSAIDs is shown to be associated with a reduced incidence of some cancers including breast and colorectal carcinomas. Epidemiological studies have documented a decreased risk of colorectal cancer deaths associated with use of aspirin. Combined case-control data, including over 30,000 colorectal cancer cases, indicated a 45% reduction in the risk of developing colorectal cancer in subjects taking NSAIDs [93]. In individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an inherited predisposition to multiple colorectal polyps (due to a mutation in APC), sulindac was shown to reduce both size and number of colorectal polyps [94]. Likewise, other NSAIDs have proven to be effective in the prevention of intestinal tumorigenesis in mouse models of FAP [95]. Studies from hereditary and sporadic colorectal cancer patients suggest that NSAIDs may interfere with the initiating steps of carcinogenesis; i.e., disturbance within the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. It was shown that both aspirin and indomethacin attenuated the transcription of β-catenin/Tcf-responsive genes by modulating Tcf activity without disrupting β-catenin/Tcf complex formation [96]. After further exploration of this mechanism, it was found that the reduced signaling activity of β-catenin in response toNSAIDswas a result of its enhanced phosphorylation [97]. Phosphorylation of amino-terminal Ser/Thr residues of β-catenin increased in response to aspirin and indomethacin in a time-dependent manner [97]. Another mechanism was shown by Nath et al. who demonstrated that aspirin inhibited β-catenin/Tcf signaling in colon cancer cells by disrupting nuclear β-catenin/Tcf [98]. This effect occurred far below the aspirin concentrations required to inhibit cell growth, and may be a critical early event in the chemopreventive activity of aspirin against colon cancer. These results have been confirmed by Boon et al. who provided in vitro and in vivo evidence that nuclear β-catenin localization and β-catenin/Tcf regulated transcription of target genes can be inhibited by sulindac [99]. In different experimental setups in vitro, sulindac also suppressed the formation of foci [100]. A recent study has shed more light on the effects of NSAIDs on β-catenin protein levels and β-catenin-related transcription in human colorectal cancer cells. Gardner et al. studied a panel of NSAIDs (indomethacin, diclofenac, sulindac sulphide and sulphone, rofecoxib) on SW480 human colorectal cancer cells. [101] All NSAIDs, except rofecoxib, were shown to decrease nuclear β-catenin content and cyclin D1 protein levels together with their anti-proliferative acitivity. [101] Many of the therapeutic effects of NSAIDs are attributed to inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis by inactivation of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 (COX-1 and 2) [96, 102]. The above mentioned studies demonstrate that COX-independent effects might be related to inhibition of Wnt signaling, since there is a clear link between the effects of NSAIDs as chemopreventive agents and β-catenin/Tcf activity [96]. New selective inhibitors of COX-2 (celecoxib and rofecoxib) are currently licensed for use in the treatment of arthritis and more recently in the chemoprevention of FAP [103]. Cardiovascular safety doubts recently put this class of compounds in the spotlight, and even led to the withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx®).

Exisulind (Aptosyn™) is the lead compound of a new category of targeted anticancer agents—Selective Apoptotic Anti-Neoplastic Drugs (SAANDs)—and is an oxidative metabolite of the NSAID sulindac. Since exisulind lacks the cyclooxygenase inhibitory activity characteristic of NSAIDs, it is not an NSAID. Exisulind and analogs are inhibitors of cyclic GMP phosphodiesterases (PDE) and have been shown to increase kinase activity and induce the expression of protein kinase G (PKG). The antineoplastic effect of Exisulind appears to be the result of PKG activation which leads to multiple downstream effects culminating in apoptosis [104]. Activated PKG has been shown to phosphorylate β-catenin at its C-terminal domain, and to cause proteasome-dependent degradation of β-catenin, independent of APC and GSK3β. As mentioned before, two pools of β-catenin exist, one associated with E-cadherin at the cell membrane, and a soluble one in the cytoplasm [105]. In the absence of Wnt, levels of β-catenin in the cytoplasmic pool are low due to targeted degradation of β-catenin. It has been however shown that β-catenin from the 2 pools can be exchanged, and that this exchange is strongly affected in cells that containmutations in APC [106]. In cells with intact Wnt signaling, exisulind did not affect β-catenin levels [107]. Since most β-catenin is then found in bound form (to E-cadherin), phosphorylation by PKG may be prevented. In cell lines expressing APC or β-catenin mutations, in which β-catenin cannot be phosphorylated (N-terminal), exisulind was shown to induce cell death. Exisulind and analogs provide a potentially superior approach to circumvent the molecular defects of the Wnt signaling pathway and to treat cancers with such defects. Preclinical data evaluating SAANDs in combination with various chemotherapy drugs indicated additive or synergistic antineoplastic effects. In clinical studies, exisulind prevented colorectal polyp formation in patients with FAP over a 24 month period [104]. Although exisulind has highly promising features, it did not meet its end point in a Phase III clinical trial for chemoprevention in FAP and has not been approved by the FDA. However, it proved highly effective for polyp treatment with statistical significance in both an FAP crossover study and a large sporadic polyp trial [107].

Vitamin A derivatives (retinoids) are potent regulators of cell proliferation and differentiation. Retinoids have been shown to inhibit the function of the oncogenic AP-1 and β-catenin/Tcf pathways as well as stabilize components of the adherens junctions [108, 109]. Xiao et al. showed that retinoid X receptor (RXR) agonists induced degradation of β-catenin and RXRα and repressed β-catenin-mediated transcription [110]. In in vivo experiments, it was shown that β-catenin interacted with RXRα in the absence of ligand, and that RXR agonists enhanced the interaction, suggesting that RXR interacts with β-catenin in a retinoid-dependent manner, and thereby reducing β-catenin/Tcf regulated transcription. Since a chemopreventive activity by retinoic acid (RA) has been demonstrated in rat colon, Mollersen et al. studied dietary supplementation with all-trans RA in Min/+ mice [111]. In these Min/+ mice, which harbour a germline mutation in the tumor suppressor gene APC, they surprisingly showed that dietary RA significantly stimulated both the formation and growth of small intestinal tumors. Although contradictory, these results suggest a potential role for retinoids in the regulation of β-catenin turnover and related biological events. Both RA and vitamin D have been shown to have growth-inhibitory effects on colonic epithelial cells. For these reasons, both compounds have been suggested as potential candidates for chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. In the case of RA, its receptor is thought to compete with β-catenin for a common binding site on Tcf4. Vitamin D has been shown in breast carcinoma cells to increase cadherin expression, thereby decreasing cytosolic β-catenin and down-regulating β-catenin signaling by a second route [112].

Endostatin (ES) is a fragment of collagen XVIII that possesses anti-angiogenic activity. There is growing evidence that anti-angiogenic drugs, like ES, will improve future therapies of diseases like cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and ocular neovascularization.

In a recent paper, ES was described as a potential inhibitor of Wnt signaling [113]. To gain insight into ES-mediated signaling, they studied the effects of ES RNA on Xenopus embryogenesis and observed developmental abnormalities consistent with impaired Wnt signaling. ES RNA blocked the axis duplication normally induced by β-catenin, partially suppressed Wnt-dependent transcription, and stimulated degradation of both wild-type and stabilized (degradation resistant through N-terminal mutations) forms of β-catenin. They found that ES used a pathway independent of the Siah1 protein in targeting β-catenin for proteasome-mediated degradation. These data were replicated in endothelial cells and also in human DLD-1 colon carcinoma cells that contain a mutated APC gene [113]. Though high levels of ES were used in both Xenopus and endothelial cell studies and the effects on β-catenin signaling were modest, these data argue that at pharmacological concentrations ES may impinge on Wnt signaling and promote β-catenin degradation.

Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) is a natural plant product, and has been shown to exhibit chemopreventive activity [114]. Since current cancer treatments such as radio- and chemotherapy are associated with severe side-effects and offer no firm expectation of a cure, there is a constant need for the investigation of other potentially useful options to prevent cancer. One of the most widely investigated approaches in cancer chemoprevention uses natural agents to reverse or inhibit the malignant transformation of cancer cells and to prevent invasion and metastasis. It was previously shown that Curcumin impairs both Wnt signaling and cell-cell adhesion pathways, resulting in G(2)/M phase arrest and apoptosis although the exact mechanism remained unknown [115]. A more recent study showed that the reduced β-catenin/Tcf transcriptional activity was due to decreased nuclear β-catenin and Tcf4 [116]. Further studies are undoubtedly necessary to elucidate the mechanism(s) involved. Because Curcumin has been shown to intervene in several pathways with a high-level of safety and no toxicity, it has been proposed to be a wide-spectrum chemopreventive agent for cancer [117-119].

Folic acid may have a chemopreventive role in colon carcinogenesis, although the mechanism(s) of action is poorly understood. It has been shown that folic acid inhibited cell proliferation and EGF-receptor (EGFR) activation in colon cancer cells [120, 121]. This effect was associated with a concomitant reduction in nuclear translocation of β-catenin [120]. Since the possible role of folic acid as an inhibitor of Wnt signaling has only recently been proposed more research would be necessary to understand the mechanism.

HDAC inhibitors The recruitment of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) is considered to be a key element in the dynamic regulation of many genes regulating cell proliferation and differentiation during normal development and carcinogenesis [122]. HDACs are usually subunits of multiprotein complexes and HDAC inhibitors are considered as very promising drug candidates for the treatment of leukemia, and various other forms of cancer [123-125]. In theory, inhibitors of HDAC may enable the re-expression of repressed regulatory genes in cancer cells and reverse the malignant phenotype. In the absence of the Wnt signal, nuclear Tcf acts as a repressor of Wnt target genes [126] by forming a complex with Groucho [21]. The repressive effect of Groucho has been shown to be mediated by interactions with HDACs [127]. β-catenin can convert Tcf into a transcriptional activator of the same genes that are repressed by Tcf alone (reviewed in [128]). It has been shown that sodium butyrate and Trichostatin A (TSA), inducers of G0–G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in the SW620 colonic carcinoma cell line, up-regulate Tcf activity. Sodium butyrate and TSA are inhibitors of HDAC activity independent of their effects on β-catenin/Tcf signaling, and by altering chromatin structure they may render loci accessible to Tcf or other transcription factors [129]. This is in agreement with data shown by Ohira et al who have shown induction of the Wnt signaling pathway target gene, E-cadherin, by HDAC inhibition with TSA or GSK3β inhibition with LiCl and an additive or synergistic effect on E-cadherin expression with both inhibitors [130]. These studies suggest that HDACs help to repress the Tcf activity. HDAC inhibitors such as butyrate and TSA, block this repression resulting in a reduction of the threshold necessary to activate Tcf transcription. Tight regulation of transcription imposed by HDACs and HATs appears to be crucial for normal activity. When this regulation is lost through HDAC inhibitors, treated cells will go into cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. In Drosophila, Tcf has been shown to interact with CBP (CREB binding protein, histone acetylase), thereby repressing gene transcription when Wnt signaling is inactive [131]. In mammalian cells, CBP/P300 can also act as a co-activator of β-catenin/Tcf [20]. This might also turn out to be one of the mechanisms by which HDAC inhibitors function. Through inhibiting HDAC, CBP/P300 will no longer be able to function as a co-activator, and possibly even repress the β-catenin/Tcf signal. A recent study by Zhu et al. showed that loss of the APC tumor suppressor induced HDAC2 expression in solid tumors [125]. This upregulation was not directly through the β-catenin pathway, but most likely indirectly through upregulation of c-Myc which is a target gene of the Wnt pathway. HDAC2 is required for and sufficient on its own to prevent apoptosis of colonic cancer cells, and interference with HDAC2 by valproic acid largely diminished adenoma formation in APC min mice.

GSK3β inhibitors can be divided into several groups: (1) the non-selective GSK3β inhibitors, such as lithium and valproic acid; (2) the ATP-competitive inhibitors, which can be divided in several classes according to their chemical structure [132]; and (3) the non-ATP-competitors such as small thiadiazolidinones derivatives, the first non-ATP competitive GSK3β inhibitors reported to date [133]. A detailed description of the different GSK3β inhibitors is beyond the scope of this review, for more information on the different classes, we refer to [134-136]. Only Lithium and Valproic acid are discussed here because many studies have demonstrated their effect on the Wnt signaling pathway.

Lithium has been shown to be a non-specific reversible inhibitor of GSK3β with an IC50 value of 2 mM [137]. Recently, it was reported that the response to lithium occurs via two levels of inhibition: a rapid, direct inhibition of GSK3β by competing for Mg2+, followed by the inactivation of Protein Phosphatase 1 and subsequent increased inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3β [138]. These two inhibitory actions following exposure to lithium probably act together in vivo to achieve an increased inhibition of GSK3β [139]. Signal transduction systems known to be perturbed by lithium involve phosphoinositide (PI) turnover, activation of the Wnt pathway via inhibition of GSK3β, and a growth factor-induced, Akt-mediated signal that promotes cell survival. These pathways, acting in synergy, probably lead to the amplification of the lithium signal. Because of the functions of GSK3β in many different signaling pathways and diseases (diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, mood disorders, inflammatory signaling and cancer), it is likely that lithium can have therapeutic effects in all these diseases, but the possibility of unwanted side-effects will also increase.

Valproic acid (VPA, 2-propylpentanoic acid) like lithium, is an established drug. During the past years, it has become evident that VPA is also associated with anti-cancer activity. VPA not only suppresses tumor growth and metastasis, but also induces tumor differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Several mechanisms of action might be relevant for the biological activity of VPA: (1) VPA increases the DNA binding ability of activating protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor, and the expression of genes regulated by the extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK)-AP-1 pathway; (2) VPA downregulates protein kinase C (PKC) activity; (3) VPA inhibits GSK3β, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway; (4) VPA activates the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors PPARγ and δ; and (5) VPA blocks HDAC [140]. VPA may thus exert its function on Wnt signaling through inhibition of GSK3β and/or inhibition of HDAC [141, 142].

Gleevec®, (Glivec, imatinib mesylate, STI571), although originally identified as platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor inhibitor, and developed as an inhibitor of the constitutively active Bcr-Abl kinase, is also able to inhibit the c-kit tyrosine kinase. It is conceivable that other tyrosine kinases may also serve as possible cellular targets of Gleevec, especially when higher concentrations of Gleevec are used [143]. Gleevec has recently been approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal tumors [143]. β-catenin is a tyrosine phosphorylated protein and some growth factors (such as HGF, IGF-1 and IGF-2) may play a role in regulating β-catenin signaling activity. Gleevec has been shown to effectively inhibit the constitutive activity of β-catenin signaling in human colon cancer cells (HCT-116 and SW480) as well as in Wnt1 induced activation of β-catenin signaling in different cell lines [143]. Furthermore, Gleevec was shown to effectively suppress the proliferation of these human colon cancer cells. The current prevailing hypothesis is that tyrosine phosphorylation of the β-catenin protein would result in decreased association with E-cadherin, leading to the disruption of junctional assembly and an increased tendency for cancer cells to become invasive and metastasize [143]. Tyrosine phosphorylation may thus play an important role in regulating β-catenin signaling activity, and inhibition of this signaling pathway by Gleevec may be further explored as an important target for alternative/adjuvant treatments for different types of cancer.

Flavonoids comprise the most common group of plant polyphenols and provide much of the flavor and color to fruits and vegetables [144]. More than 5000 different flavonoids have been described, and they are divided into 6 subclasses. Yang and colleagues have recently published several articles on the effect of different flavonoids, such as quercetin, naringenin and flavanone, on β-catenin/Tcf signaling using in vitro assays [145-147]. Their data suggest that the different flavonoids tested inhibit β-catenin/Tcf signaling efficiently although a common mechanism by which flavonoids inhibit Tcf activity remains to be established. The large amount of studies on flavonoids exemplifies the interest in the biological properties of natural products as a means to identify novel small molecular weight compounds that could have potential as therapeutic. Because different studies have reported contrasting observations ranging from a protective effect of flavonoid consumption in cardiovascular disease and cancer to potential harm, it would be imperative to have a thorough understanding of the different mechanisms of action whereby flavonoids might act in different tumor and normal cell types. In vitro studies such as those reported by Park et al. are important in the determination of the potential of a compound as a chemotherapeutic agent. This group has recently also shown that ionomycin inhibits β-catenin/Tcf signaling in colon cancer cells [148].

Drug design strategies for the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways in cancer

Many components of the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways may represent targets for future drug discovery efforts. As previously described, the initial step in Wnt-dependent signaling is the interaction between Wnt and Fzd. Cancer cell growth may be inhibited by an agent that would selectively inhibit the binding of the Wnt protein with its Fzd receptor or which would upregulate the expression of endogenous antagonists such as sFRP,WIF-1, Cerberus or DKK. This agent could be an antibody that specifically binds to a Wnt protein, or a Fzd receptor to disrupt the binding between ligand and receptor. It has recently been demonstrated that anti-Wnt2 antibodies can induce apoptosis in human cancer cells [53, 54]. These antibodies showed no detectable effect on normal cell lines, suggesting anti-Wnt2 antibody could specifically induce apoptosis in cancer cells, whilst sparing normal cells. Anti-Wnt antibodies may not only directly induce apoptosis in cancer cells that overexpress Wnt proteins, but also counter potential drug resistance by restoring the normal apoptotic machinery in these tumor cells [52]. A potential hurdle that antibody-based therapies could face is the epitope accessibility in the tumor.

Although ligand-receptor interactions are heavily targeted in drug discovery, the ligand-receptor interaction in the Wnt signaling pathway is not as straightforward as for other pathways. Of the entire Wnt signaling pathway, least is known about the ligand-receptor interaction. One major barrier hampering the understanding of this has been the difficulty in obtaining soluble and biologically active Wnt proteins. With the recent success by Willert et al. in purifying Wnt3a [149], and elucidating the chemical basis for the uncooperative property of Wnt proteins, this hurdle has been overcome. The second problem is the specificity of Wnt/Fzd interactions. As indicated previously, the Wnt family consists of at least 19 members (http://www.stanford.edu/~rnusse/wntwindow.html) who all share a conserved pattern of 23 or 24 cysteine residues, several asparagine-linked glycosylation sites and a length of 350 to 400 amino acids [150]. The Fzd family consists of 10 members (http://www.stanford.edu/~rnusse/wntwindow.html). Structurally, Fzd receptors are similar to other seven-pass transmembrane proteins such as G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), but the actual signaling through a G-protein has only been observed in a few cases. Direct binding with full-length Fzd has been demonstrated for only a few Wnt proteins, including Wg and XWnt8 [151, 152]. These in vitro binding experiments showed that a single Wnt can bind to several Fzd proteins, including homologous members from a different species. A more comprehensive assessment of the interactions between various Wnt/Fzd pairs remains to be conducted. The promiscuous binding pattern observed with some Wnt and Fzd members raises the possibility that there may be considerable redundancy in ligand-receptor interactions [151-153]. The fact that Fzd receptors are putative GPCRs makes it a more interesting target. It has been estimated that 50% of all modern drugs and almost one-quarter of the top-selling drugs in the year 2000 modulated GPCR activity [154]. This reflects the expertise many pharmaceutical companies have on GPCR drug design. However, despite the past success of drug development on GPCRs, current efforts to bring further classes of GPCR-targeted drugs through the pipeline are proving less productive than might have been predicted. This is in spite of the accumulated knowledge on GPCRs. This has led to a change in the way drug discovery is being approached. The emphasis of GPCR-directed drug discovery is shifting from a traditional focus on biogenic monoamine receptors, which have natural ligands that are readily amenable to chemical modification to produce lead compounds, to a more recent focus on peptide-activated receptors, which present an entirely different type of synthetic challenge to the drug discovery community. The Wnt/Fzd interaction is one such example of a peptide-receptor interaction, and thus may be a reason for avoiding this interaction as a drug target, until more is known about these types of interactions. The third problem is the co-receptor. The β-catenin pathway requires an additional single-pass transmembrane protein, known as LRP5 and LRP6 from the low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, to function as an obligate co-receptor for transducing the Wnt signal [9-11]. This adds another level of complexity as different receptor and co-receptor combinations can result in the transduction of signals down different pathways. LRPs are single transmembrane proteins that contain epidermal growth factor like repeats and three LDL-receptor type Q repeats in their extracellular region [155]. Intracellularly, these proteins contain a prolinerich region that are predicted to bind to SH3 domain containing proteins. It appears that these co-receptors associate with Fzd in a Wnt-dependent fashion [10]. It is not yet clear how these complexes are organized; they may be heterotrimeric complexes of LRP, Fzd and Wnt, or heterodimeric complexes of just Fzd and LRP. It may also be that these proteins are important intracellularly, bridging Fzd and Dvl, or Fzd and other signaling molecules such as SH3 domain containing proteins. The function of the LRP co-receptors appears to be tightly connected to their Fzd/Wnt-related functions since knocking out these proteins mimics a combination of Wnt knockout phenotypes [44]. These observations make the Wnt/Fzd interaction a very difficult target for small molecule inhibitors, additional to the fact that peptide interactions are inherently more difficult targets to modulate.

Following activation of the Fzd receptor, the unequivocal identification of the downstream signaling mechanism remains to be unraveled. One hypothetical pathway leads to Dvl activation. Data suggest that Dvl proteins organize dynamic, pathway-specific subcellular signaling complexes that ensure correct information routing, signal amplification, and dynamic control through feedback regulation [156]. Interrupting the Fzd-Dvl interaction could serve as a powerful tool to dissect the molecular mechanism underlying the Wnt pathways. Furthermore, it could interfere with specific Wnt signaling events that contribute to cancer and other human diseases.

There is evidence that the multiprotein β-catenin destruction complex could turn out to be a relatively good drug target. Of the components of the complex (Axin, APC, β-catenin and GSK3β), GSK3β is the best validated target, due to its implication in the pathophysiology of numerous other diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, and bipolar disorder [157, 158]. Originally identified as a modulator of glycogen metabolism, GSK3 is now understood to play an important role in a variety of pathways including initiation of protein synthesis, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, apoptosis, and is essential in embryonic development as a component of the Wnt signaling cascade. GSK3 can be considered as a target for both metabolic and neurological disorders. However, a major concern is that since this protein is involved in so many pathways and diseases, compounds targeting this protein for its function in one pathway (and linked disease) will alter its function in another pathway and potentially give rise to serious side effects (on-target side effects). For instance, lithium described as a nonselective GSK3β inhibitor is used for treatment of bipolar disorder as well as in cancer research, to activate the Wnt signaling pathway as a model for carcinogenesis. It is thus of considerable importance to determine if GSK3β inhibitors also have a tumorigenic effect. Gould et al. recently investigated the effects of lithium in a murine model predisposed to the formation of tumors due to activation of the Wnt pathway (the APC multiple intestinal neoplasia (min) mouse) [159]. They found that 60 days of lithium treatment did not produce a significant increase in the number of tumors in these genetically predisposed mice, it only resulted in a modest overall increase in the tumor size [159]. These results suggest that lithium, which has been prescribed for more than 50 years, and by extension perhaps other inhibitors of GSK3, pose a low risk for the development of cancers. This is entirely consistent with the available epidemiological evidence that long term lithium therapy does not increase cancer morbidity or mortality. Furthermore, other mechanisms independent of phosphorylation by GSK3 can contribute to β-catenin degradation indicating a redundancy inmechanisms leading to β-catenin degradation. Recent crystal structures, including the active (phosphorylated Tyr-216) form of GSK3β, provided a wealth of structural information and greater understanding of GSK3’s unique regulation and substrate specificity [160].

As stated previously, activation of β-catenin is a critical step in the pathogenesis of many common human cancers and is the initiating event in adenocarcinoma of the colon [161]. Oncogenes such as β-catenin represent (in theory) extremely attractive molecular targets for the development of anticancer compounds as specific pharmacological inhibition of activated β-catenin might reverse the tumorigenic properties of human cancer cells and therefore form the basis of an effective anticancer strategy [161]. Recently, proof of principle was shown when small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) directed against β-catenin inhibited the in vitro and in vivo growth of colon cancer cells. These siRNAs ultimately may have the potential as a therapeutic modality to treat cancer [162, 163]. β-catenin has diverse functions as an essential component of intercellular junctions and the Wnt signaling pathway and has therefore numerous different binding partners (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Interaction sites for binding partners of β-catenin (from http://www.stanford.edu/~rnusse/wntwindow.html).

The interaction of β-catenin with Lef/Tcf transcription factors is seen as one of the crucial events. Overexpression of dominant negative Tcf4 in colorectal tumor cells causes cells to arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle supporting the relevance of Tcf4 in colorectal tumor cell proliferation [164]. Several studies have shown that inhibition of the initiating transforming event in colorectal cancer cell lines, i.e., the inappropriate formation of a β-catenin/Tcf complex, drives these cells out of the cycle [164]. Tcf4 inhibition induced colorectal cancer cells to differentiate into a villus epithelial phenotype, essentially completing their life cycle after many years delay [165]. Tcf4 has recently been identified as a transcriptional target of p53 signaling. Induction of p53 leads to a reduction of Tcf4 mRNA and protein [166], and thus acts to decrease the Wnt/β-catenin signaling activity. Hence, the accumulated data make a strong argument to consider the β-catenin/Tcf4 complex a promising target for therapeutic intervention in cancer. Small molecular weight inhibitors of this interaction might therefore be expected to have anti-tumorigenic effects.

Lepourcelet et al. have explored high-throughput screening of compound libraries in search for small molecule inhibitors of the Wnt cascade [167]. Out of approximately 7,000 natural compounds, 8 displayed reproducible and dose-dependent inhibition of the protein-protein interaction between β-catenin and Tcf4 in an immunoenzymatic assay with IC50 values lower than 10 µM (Figure 3). Six compounds were evaluated in a range of in vitro secondary assays such as reporter gene activation, expression analysis, cell proliferation, and Xenopus duplication assay. Three compounds (PKF115-584, CGP049090, and PKF222-815), with the same chemical core structure, scored consistently in the different assays (surface plasmon resonance, reporter gene assays, GST-pulldown assay, electrophoretic mobility shift assay) used to confirm the antagonistic properties of the compounds. Initial reports from Lepourcelet et al. show that the classical approach of high throughput screening in a cell-free assay can yield protein interaction inhibitors that retain their effects when tested in cell-based assays [167]. A search of the patent literature indicates that several other groups are studying compounds and methods for modulating β-catenin mediated gene expression. For instance, Blaschuk et al. described several peptide sequences capable of affecting the interaction between β-catenin and transcription factors [168], while Moll et al. identified a compound which is able to interact with β-catenin/Tcf4 [169]. The difference in binding affinity of Tcf4 to β-catenin in the presence of an inhibitor was determined through Isothermal Titration µ-Calorimetry (ITC). The identified compound reduced Tcf4 affinity for β-catenin about 10-fold. NMR screening, which is particularly suited for the identification of protein-protein interaction antagonists confirmed that the compound is an antagonist of the β-catenin/Tcf4 interaction.

Figure 3

Lead structures for Wnt signaling pathway inhibitors.

More recently, a patent and subsequent publication by Kahn et al., disclosed the preparation and biological evaluation of a series of compounds able to block the β-catenin/Tcf4 transcriptional pathway by inhibiting cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CBP) (Figure 4) [70, 171]. CBP or its closely related homolog p300 were initially identified in protein interaction assays, first through their association with the transcription factor CREB [172] and later through their interaction with the adenoviral-transforming protein E1A [173]. CBP had the potential to participate in a variety of cellular functions including transcriptional coactivator function [174]. CBP/p300 potentiates β-catenin mediated activation [20]. β-catenin interacts directly with the CREB-binding domain of CBP and β-catenin synergizes with CBP to stimulate the transcriptional activation of β-catenin/Tcf4 [175]. The compound (ICG-001; Figure 4) described by Kahn et al. showed specific affinity and inhibition of CBP, and proved effective in preventing CBP-mediated transcriptional activation and β-catenin/Tcf4 transcription in luciferase reporter gene assays. ICG-001 induced apoptosis in SW480 colon cancer cells in a concentration dependent manner, but not in normal colonic epithelial cells and inhibited the growth of SW480 cells with an IC50 value of 8.07 µM. They also demonstrated that ICG-001 was efficacious in both the Min mouse and nude mouse SW620 xenograft models of cancer [170]. Mapping studies demonstrated that the interacting domains of both CBP and p300 with the C-terminus of β-catenin reside within the N-terminal 110 residues of the co-activators. Interestingly, this region also contains the CBP/p300-binding site for retinoic acid (RA) receptors, RXR/RAR [176]. It has been shown that RA treatment inhibits β-catenin/Tcf-mediated transcription [177].

Figure 4

Chemical structure of ICG-001.

Ultimately, the above described compounds could become novel anticancer drugs. These compounds certainly have considerable potential as tools for the investigation of β-catenin dependent cellular pathways. They also clearly show the feasibility of targeting protein-protein interactions in cancer drug discovery. The β-catenin/Tcf complex is thus an attractive target for anti-cancer drugs, but any such compound must selectively interfere with the complex without disrupting other essential interactions of β-catenin [178].

The design of compounds targeting the β-catenin/Tcf interaction depends on a detailed understanding of the interactions of β-catenin with its other interaction partners. The interaction between Tcf transcription factors and β-catenin requires a minimal N-terminal Tcf fragment and the central domain of 12 armadillo repeats in β-catenin [179, 180]. Disrupting the E-cadherin binding has been implicated in the transition form adenoma to carcinoma, suggesting that the adhesive role of β-catenin is likely to be crucial for suppressing tumor growth and metastasis. Disrupting the interaction of β-catenin with APC or Axin would also have undesirable consequences, as it would lead to a larger pool of free β-catenin by inhibiting β-catenin degradation. Increasing concentrations of the drug would then be required to inhibit the β-catenin/Tcf interaction. The compounds shown in Figure 3 that have been described as β-catenin/Tcf4 antagonists also disrupt cellular β-catenin/APC complexes [167] supporting the speculation that pharmacological interference with β-catenin complexes may be inherently unselective [180-182]. The β-catenin/Tcf complex is an enticing target for rational design of cancer therapeutics, but the promiscuity of β-catenin makes it clear that this strategy will not be easy. More detailed thermodynamic and structural data on ligand recognition by β-catenin and insights obtained from the crystal structures of β-catenin/Tcf [183, 184] and alternative protein complexes should aid this process. But the results by Emami et al. have shown that targeting alternative mechanisms to inhibit a subset of β-catenin/Tcf-mediated transcription can enhance the selectivity of the compounds [170].

Given that the Wnt signaling pathway is implicated in a substantial number of diseases, and given that a number of mutations lead to the activation of this pathway and cancer in several tissues, there is a clear need for drugs that attenuate the nuclear functions of β-catenin. Future development of both peptide and non-peptide based inhibitors of components of the Wnt signaling pathway, combined with further elucidation of mechanisms of action will undoubtedly result in the generation of more potent and specific inhibitors of Wnt signaling. These inhibitors may provide significant therapeutic benefit against a variety of human diseases in which the Wnt signaling pathway plays an important pathological role.

In conclusion, we have discussed the many opportunities that lie within the Wnt signaling pathway to be used as targets in oncology drug discovery. In addition, the small molecule inhibitors of the Wnt signaling pathway that have been discussed here could clear the path for large scale screens to discover specific inhibitors that target components or mechanisms in the Wnt-dependent signaling pathways.