Literature DB >> 16673826

Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.

Tracy Peña1, Raymond C Pitts, Mark Galizio.   

Abstract

Identity matching-to-sample has been difficult to demonstrate in rats, but most studies have used visual stimuli. There is evidence that rats can acquire complex forms of olfactory stimulus control, and the present study explored the possibility that identity matching might be facilitated in rats if olfactory stimuli were used. Four rats were trained on an identity match-to-sample procedure with odorants mixed in cups of sand as stimuli. Digging in the sample cup produced two comparison cups, and digging in the comparison cup that contained the same scent as the sample was reinforced. When criterion accuracy levels were reached, novel stimuli were added to the baseline training regimen. All 4 rats reached terminal performance of above 90% correct matching with more than 20 different baseline stimuli and matched novel stimulus combinations with above-chance accuracy; 3 of the 4 rats matched novel stimuli at levels significantly above chance. Accurate matching performance was demonstrated both with 2- and 3-comparison procedures. These results suggest that generalized matching-to-sample can be observed in rats when olfactory stimuli are used and, furthermore, that multiple-exemplar training may be important for its emergence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16673826      PMCID: PMC1472630          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.111-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation.

Authors:  P A Dudchenko; E R Wood; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity.

Authors:  E R Wood; P A Dudchenko; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  D L Oden; R K Thompson; D Premack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-04

4.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.

Authors:  D E Carter; T J Werner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Pigeons can learn identity or difference, or both.

Authors:  T R Zentall; D E Hogan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The hippocampus and transverse patterning guided by olfactory cues.

Authors:  J A Dusek; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Auditory delayed matching in the bottlenose dolphin.

Authors:  L M Herman; J A Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey.

Authors:  M Mishkin; J Delacour
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1975-10

9.  Visual memory task for rats reveals an essential role for hippocampus and perirhinal cortex.

Authors:  G T Prusky; R M Douglas; L Nelson; A Shabanpoor; R J Sutherland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Odor matching and odor memory in the rat.

Authors:  X C Lu; B M Slotnick; A M Silberberg
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  Emergent identity matching after successive matching training, I: reflexivity or generalized identity.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Emergent identity matching after successive matching training. II: Reflexivity or transitivity.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Melissa Swisher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Authors:  Katherine Bruce; Katherine Dyer; Michael Mathews; Catharine Nealley; Tiffany Phasukkan; Ashley Prichard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Learning strategies in matching to sample: if-then and configural learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Kent D Bodily; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Reflexivity in pigeons.

Authors:  Mary M Sweeney; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training.

Authors:  Saulo M Velasco; Edson M Huziwara; Armando Machado; Gerson Y Tomanari
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.

Authors:  L Brooke April; Katherine Bruce; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Tactile perception and working memory in rats and humans.

Authors:  Arash Fassihi; Athena Akrami; Vahid Esmaeili; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Olfactory Stimulus Control and the Behavioral Pharmacology of Remembering.

Authors:  Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-03-17

Review 10.  The search for symmetry: 25 years in review.

Authors:  Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.