Literature DB >> 10751449

Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation.

P A Dudchenko1, E R Wood, H Eichenbaum.   

Abstract

Recent work has shown that lesions of the hippocampus in monkeys cause deficits in the capacity to remember increasing numbers of objects, colors, and spatial locations (). However, others have observed that hippocampectomized monkeys can show intact memory for a list of objects or locations (). We wished to explore the effects of hippocampal damage on the capacity of memory in the rodent and, to do so, developed novel "span" tasks in which a variable number of odors or locations had to be remembered. In the odor span task (experiment 1), rats were trained on a nonmatching to sample task in which increasing numbers of odors had to be remembered. Half of the trained rats received ibotenic acid lesions of the hippocampus. Postoperatively, hippocampectomized animals did not differ from control animals even when required to remember up to 24 odors. However, when tested on delayed retention of a list of 12 odors, rats with hippocampal lesions were impaired at a long delay. Also, these rats were impaired on a subsequent test of delayed spatial alternation. In a spatial span task (experiment 2), naive rats were trained on a nonmatching to sample task in which a variable number of locations had to be remembered. After this, half of the animals received ibotenic acid lesions. Postoperatively, hippocampectomized animals performed above chance levels when required to remember a single cup location, but were unable to remember more. Subsequent testing on another spatial delayed alternation task suggested that hippocampectomized rats could recognize, but could not inhibit their approach to previously visited locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10751449      PMCID: PMC6772220     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

1.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Learning 10,000 pictures.

Authors:  L Standing
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Hippocampectomized monkeys can remember one place but not two.

Authors:  S J Angeli; E A Murray; M Mishkin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The effects of fornix and medial prefrontal lesions on delayed non-matching-to-sample by rats.

Authors:  C Shaw; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-03-31       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The effects of hippocampectomy on performance by rats of a running recognition task using long lists of non-spatial items.

Authors:  K Steele; J N Rawlins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-03-31       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system.

Authors:  S Zola-Morgan; L R Squire; S J Ramus
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Critical determinants of nonspatial working memory deficits in rats with conventional lesions of the hippocampus or fornix.

Authors:  J N Rawlins; G L Lyford; A Seferiades; R M Deacon; H J Cassaday
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Hippocampal system dysfunction and odor discrimination learning in rats: impairment or facilitation depending on representational demands.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A Fagan; P Mathews; N J Cohen
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  The effects of hippocampal lesions upon spatial and non-spatial tests of working memory.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; P R Hunt; J N Rawlins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities.

Authors:  W A Suzuki; S Zola-Morgan; L R Squire; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  69 in total

1.  Accumulation of hippocampal place fields at the goal location in an annular watermaze task.

Authors:  S A Hollup; S Molden; J G Donnett; M B Moser; E I Moser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus.

Authors:  Norbert J Fortin; Sean P Wright; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Nicotine improves working memory span capacity in rats following sub-chronic ketamine exposure.

Authors:  Samantha L Rushforth; Thomas Steckler; Mohammed Shoaib
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Effects of dizocilpine (MK801) on olfactory span in rats.

Authors:  Dave A MacQueen; Laura Bullard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Tracy Peña; Raymond C Pitts; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  NMDA receptor involvement in spatial delayed alternation in developing rats.

Authors:  Deborah J Watson; Mariel R Herbert; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties.

Authors:  Owen Y Chao; Maria A de Souza Silva; Yi-Mei Yang; Joseph P Huston
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Time Cells in the Hippocampus Are Neither Dependent on Medial Entorhinal Cortex Inputs nor Necessary for Spatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Marta Sabariego; Antonia Schönwald; Brittney L Boublil; David T Zimmerman; Siavash Ahmadi; Nailea Gonzalez; Christian Leibold; Robert E Clark; Jill K Leutgeb; Stefan Leutgeb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Replay of Episodic Memories in the Rat.

Authors:  Danielle Panoz-Brown; Vishakh Iyer; Lawrence M Carey; Christina M Sluka; Gabriela Rajic; Jesse Kestenman; Meredith Gentry; Sydney Brotheridge; Isaac Somekh; Hannah E Corbin; Kjersten G Tucker; Bianca Almeida; Severine B Hex; Krysten D Garcia; Andrea G Hohmann; Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The hippocampus and memory for "what," "where," and "when".

Authors:  Ceren Ergorul; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.