Literature DB >> 28713029

Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Katherine Bruce1, Katherine Dyer2, Michael Mathews2, Catharine Nealley2, Tiffany Phasukkan2, Ashley Prichard2, Mark Galizio2.   

Abstract

There is a growing body of research on matching- and non-matching-to-sample (MTS, NMTS) relations with rats using olfactory stimuli; however, the specific characteristics of this relational control are unclear. In the current study we examine MTS and NMTS in rats with an automated olfactometer using a successive (go, no-go) procedure. Ten rats were trained to either match- or non-match-to-sample with common scents (apple, cinnamon, etc.) as olfactory stimuli. After matching or non-matching training with four odorants, rats were tested for transfer twice with four new odorants on each test. Most rats trained on MTS showed immediate transfer to new stimuli, and most rats trained on NMTS showed full transfer by the second set of new odors. After meeting criterion on the second transfer test, the contingencies were reversed with four new odor stimuli such that subjects trained on matching were shifted to non-matching and vice versa. Following these reversed contingencies, the effects of the original training persisted for many trials with new odorants. These data extend previous studies on same-different concept formation in rats, showing strong generalization requiring few exemplars. The critical role of olfactory stimuli is discussed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abstract concepts; Identity; Matching-to-sample; Olfaction; Rats; Same-different

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28713029      PMCID: PMC5767153          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  28 in total

1.  Animal cognition and the rat olfactory system.

Authors:  B Slotnick
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Same-different categorization in rats.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Leyre Castro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

4.  Issues in the Comparative Cognition of Abstract-Concept Learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2007-01-01

5.  Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.

Authors:  L Brooke April; Katherine Bruce; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A harbor seal can transfer the same/different concept to new stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Christine Scholtyssek; Almut Kelber; Frederike D Hanke; Guido Dehnhardt
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  The hippocampus and memory for orderly stimulus relations.

Authors:  J A Dusek; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Conditional same/different concept learning in the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus).

Authors:  Fiona Russell; Darren Burke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concept learning set-size functions for Clark's nutcrackers.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; John F Magnotti; Jeffrey S Katz; Kevin Leonard; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Odor matching and odor memory in the rat.

Authors:  X C Lu; B M Slotnick; A M Silberberg
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.