Literature DB >> 811754

An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey.

M Mishkin, J Delacour.   

Abstract

Visual memory in monkeys was examined under four different conditions, each with a separate group. In all conditions, the delay between sample and choice was 10 sec, and the delay between trials was 30 sec. The procedural differences were matching or nonmatching with the same two objects presented repeatedly and matching or nonmatching with trial-unique objects. With the customary repetitive stimuli, whether in matching or nonmatching, most monkeys either required prolonged training to solve the problem (over 40 sessions) or failed to solve it, corroborating the learning difficulties reported earlier by others. With trial-unique stimuli, by contrast, most monkeys learned quickly (matching, under 20 sessions; nonmatching, under 5 sessions). Furthermore, in nonmatching with trial-unique stimuli, scores averaged 80% correct in the first session, even though the monkeys were experimentally naive. The results indicate that recognition of a stimulus as familiar or novel is highly developed in monkeys, and that their difficulty with the customary nonspatial visual memory tasks stems from a retardation in noticing and using the mnemonic cue of recovery of presentation. Evidence is presented that this difficulty can be overcome, however, by a simple training procedure that exploits their proficiency at distinguishing familiar from novel stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 811754     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.1.4.326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  67 in total

1.  Differential neural responses during performance of matching and nonmatching to sample tasks at two delay intervals.

Authors:  R Elliott; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region.

Authors:  S M Zola; L R Squire; E Teng; L Stefanacci; E A Buffalo; R E Clark
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Long-term potentiation and memory.

Authors:  Richard G M Morris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The Roman strains of rats as a psychogenetic tool for pharmacological investigation of working memory: example with RU 41656.

Authors:  F Willig; D Van de Velde; J Laurent; M M'Harzi; J Delacour
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Spontaneous object recognition and its relevance to schizophrenia: a review of findings from pharmacological, genetic, lesion and developmental rodent models.

Authors:  L Lyon; L M Saksida; T J Bussey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Nonverbal Working Memory for Novel Images in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  In search of an auditory engram.

Authors:  Jonathan Fritz; Mortimer Mishkin; Richard C Saunders
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Transfer of matching-to-figure samples in the pigeon.

Authors:  R Pisacreta; E Redwood; K Witt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Tracy Peña; Raymond C Pitts; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The hippocampus and memory for "what," "where," and "when".

Authors:  Ceren Ergorul; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.