Literature DB >> 8511188

Odor matching and odor memory in the rat.

X C Lu1, B M Slotnick, A M Silberberg.   

Abstract

To assess olfactory matching-to-sample learning, rats were exposed to two odors separated by a 1-s presentation of clean air. If, and only if, the odors were identical, a response produced a water reinforcer. High levels of performance were maintained over a series of 10 novel three-odor matching-to-sample problems on this conditional go/no-go discrimination procedure. In general, performance accuracy improved over problems and errorless or near errorless performance on many stimulus combinations, particularly near the end of training, indicated acquisition of a learning set. There was little decrement in performance when the interstimulus interval was increased gradually from 1 to 10 s and matching-to-sample was not disrupted when a novel odor was presented during the interstimulus interval. These results demonstrate that rats readily learn an olfactory matching-to-sample task, maintain high levels of performance even with delays of 10-s between stimuli, and can acquire a matching-to-sample learning set. The outcomes are in agreement with prior studies demonstrating exceptional learning of instrumental tasks by rats when they are provided with odor cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8511188     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(93)90191-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  17 in total

1.  Local inactivation of Gpr88 in the nucleus accumbens attenuates behavioral deficits elicited by the neonatal administration of phencyclidine in rats.

Authors:  M Ingallinesi; L Le Bouil; N Faucon Biguet; A Do Thi; C Mannoury la Cour; M J Millan; P Ravassard; J Mallet; R Meloni
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Tracy Peña; Raymond C Pitts; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Authors:  Katherine Bruce; Katherine Dyer; Michael Mathews; Catharine Nealley; Tiffany Phasukkan; Ashley Prichard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Impaired olfactory discrimination learning and decreased olfactory sensitivity in aged C57Bl/6 mice.

Authors:  Roseanne C Patel; John Larson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  An inexpensive and automated method for presenting olfactory or tactile stimuli to rats in a two-choice discrimination task.

Authors:  Iver H Iversen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Distinct hippocampal time cell sequences represent odor memories in immobilized rats.

Authors:  Christopher J MacDonald; Stephen Carrow; Ryan Place; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.

Authors:  L Brooke April; Katherine Bruce; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Alterations in brain function after loss of docosahexaenoate due to dietary restriction of n-3 fatty acids.

Authors:  N Salem; T Moriguchi; R S Greiner; K McBride; A Ahmad; J N Catalan; B Slotnick
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.444

9.  Olfactory Stimulus Control and the Behavioral Pharmacology of Remembering.

Authors:  Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-03-17

10.  A comparison of discrimination and reversal learning for olfactory and visual stimuli in aged rats.

Authors:  Andrea M Brushfield; Trinh T Luu; Bryan D Callahan; Paul E Gilbert
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.