Literature DB >> 16648277

Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome.

H-H Chiang1, Y-M Yu Chao, Y-S Yuh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although maternal serum screening (MSS) for Down's syndrome has become routinely available in most obstetric clinics in many countries, few studies have addressed the reasons why women agree to undergo the MSS test.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to describe the circumstances in which MSS was offered to pregnant women and their reasons for undertaking it.
METHODS: Participant observation and in depth interviews were used in this study; specifically, the experiences of women who had a positive result for MSS and who then followed this up with amniocentesis were examined. The interviewees were twenty six mothers aged between 22 and 35 years. The interviews were audio taped and transcribed for analysis. The results were analysed by the constant comparative method.
RESULTS: This study identified the reasons on which pregnant women appeared to base their decisions when undergoing MSS. The reasons were first, the recognition that the procedure was a prenatal routine procedure; second, the need to avoid the risk of giving birth to a baby with Down's syndrome, and third, a trust in modern technology and in the professional authorities.
CONCLUSIONS: This study offers insights into the informed choice made by women with a positive MSS result. The reasons for undergoing MSS might help health professionals and policy makers to reflect on their practice and this may, in turn, improve the quality of prenatal care during MSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16648277      PMCID: PMC2579413          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.012385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  20 in total

1.  Understanding the trusted doctor and constructing a theory of bioethics.

Authors:  R Rhodes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001

2.  Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: are there racial/ethnic differences?

Authors:  Lee A Learman; Miriam Kuppermann; Elena Gates; Robert F Nease; Virginia Gildengorin; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

3.  Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations.

Authors:  Erik Parens; Adrienne Asch
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2003

4.  Aren't we all eugenicists? Commentary on Paul Lombardo's "Taking eugenics seriously".

Authors:  Mary B Mahowald
Journal:  Fla State Univ Law Rev       Date:  2003

5.  To have or to be: ways of caregiving identified during recovery from the earthquake disaster in Taiwan.

Authors:  H-H Chiang; Z-Y Lu; S E Wear
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Prenatal diagnosis, prenatal screening, and the rise of the tentative pregnancy.

Authors:  T Tymstra
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Factors influencing the uptake of screening for open neural-tube defects and amniocentesis to test for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  T M Marteau; M Johnston; R W Shaw; J Slack
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-06

8.  Reluctant collaborators: do patients want to be involved in decisions concerning care?

Authors:  S Waterworth; K A Luker
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Maternal serum-alpha-fetoprotein measurement in antenatal screening for anencephaly and spina bifida in early pregnancy. Report of U.K. collaborative study on alpha-fetoprotein in relation to neural-tube defects.

Authors:  N J Wald; H Cuckle; J H Brock; R Peto; P E Polani; F P Woodford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-06-25       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  How women deal with the results of serum screening for Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  M J Weinans; A M Huijssoon; T Tymstra; M C Gerrits; J R Beekhuis; A Mantingh
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  11 in total

1.  Foetal surgery and using in utero therapies to reduce the degree of disability after birth. Could it be morally defensible or even morally required?

Authors:  Constantinos Kanaris
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-03

2.  Prenatal Genetic Screening and Potential Complicity in Abortion: Considerations for Catholic Health Care.

Authors:  Carolyn A Laabs
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-11-07

3.  Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study.

Authors:  Judith L S Budd; Elizabeth S Draper; Robyn R Lotto; Laura E Berry; Lucy K Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England.

Authors:  Hyacinth O Ukuhor; Janet Hirst; S José Closs; William J Montelpare
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2017-03-22

5.  Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiang Huang; Shu-Fang Shih; Chen-Li Lin; Chieh-Hsing Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Beyond Trisomy 21: Additional Chromosomal Anomalies Detected through Routine Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Catriona Hippman; Melanie Pastuck; Jo-Ann Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Kevin W Southern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A comparison of face to face and group education on informed choice and decisional conflict of pregnant women about screening tests of fetal abnormalities.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Sahar Riyazi; Marziyeh Lotfalizade; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Hoseyn Jafari Suny
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2018-01-10

9.  Psychosocial Factors of Health Professionals' Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.

Authors:  Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi; Johanie Lépine; Jordie Croteau; Hubert Robitaille; Anik Mc Giguere; Brenda J Wilson; François Rousseau; Isabelle Lévesque; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Autism Spectrum Disorders: Prenatal Genetic Testing and Abortion Decision-Making among Taiwanese Mothers of Affected Children.

Authors:  Wei-Ju Chen; Shixi Zhao; Tse-Yang Huang; Oi-Man Kwok; Lei-Shih Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.