Literature DB >> 12704634

Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: are there racial/ethnic differences?

Lee A Learman1, Miriam Kuppermann, Elena Gates, Robert F Nease, Virginia Gildengorin, A Eugene Washington.   

Abstract

The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R(2) values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12704634     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  17 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Awareness and attitudes regarding prenatal testing among Texas women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Amy P Case; Tunu A Ramadhani; Mark A Canfield; Catherine A Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  H-H Chiang; Y-M Yu Chao; Y-S Yuh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Racial-ethnic differences in genetic amniocentesis uptake.

Authors:  Jennifer B Saucier; Dennis Johnston; Catherine A Wicklund; Patricia Robbins-Furman; Jacqueline T Hecht; Manju Monga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Attitudes Towards Prenatal Genetic Counseling, Prenatal Genetic Testing, and Termination of Pregnancy among Southeast and East Asian Women in the United States.

Authors:  Ginger J Tsai; Carrie A Cameron; Jennifer L Czerwinski; Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Susan K Peterson; Sarah Jane Noblin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake.

Authors:  Reana Tischler; Louanne Hudgins; Yair J Blumenfeld; Henry T Greely; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Ambivalence toward undergoing invasive prenatal testing: an exploration of its origins.

Authors:  Julie Chevalier Sapp; Sara Chandros Hull; Shelby Duffer; Sarah Zornetzer; Erica Sutton; Theresa M Marteau; Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural Latinas.

Authors:  Courtney Griffiths; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.