Literature DB >> 32549638

Prenatal Genetic Screening and Potential Complicity in Abortion: Considerations for Catholic Health Care.

Carolyn A Laabs1.   

Abstract

Prenatal genetic screening (PGS) is commonplace in the United States and in some parts of the world. The commonly held rationale for screening is to respect patient autonomy and to either allow the mother the opportunity to prepare herself to parent a child with a genetic disorder or to abort. As a result, PGS combined with prenatal diagnostic testing followed by abortion has significantly reduced the number of babies born with Down syndrome, for example, and, furthermore, has raised concerns about discrimination against persons with disabilities and eugenics. Although Catholic teaching clearly prohibits PGS and testing when undertaken with the intention of abortion, screening routinely is performed in Catholic health care, sometimes without regard to intent. This essay explores the issue of PGS in Catholic health care and suggests the development of a policy designed to support morally legitimate use of screening through an educational and informed consent process and attestation as to intent so as to prevent abortion or at least avoid complicity in it. Although the issue applies to prenatal testing as well as screening and for a variety of disorders as well as gender, this essay limits itself to a discussion of first trimester screening and a focus on Down syndrome. Objections to such a policy are discussed. © Catholic Medical Association 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Catholic health care; Cooperation; Down syndrome; Eugenics; Prenatal genetic screening

Year:  2019        PMID: 32549638      PMCID: PMC7273625          DOI: 10.1177/0024363919886515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  11 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: a systematic review of termination rates (1995-2011).

Authors:  Jaime L Natoli; Deborah L Ackerman; Suzanne McDermott; Janice G Edwards
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?

Authors:  E C Winkler
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Disclosure of Religious Identity and Health Care Practices on Catholic Hospital Websites.

Authors:  Joelle Takahashi; Abigail Cher; Jeanelle Sheeder; Stephanie Teal; Maryam Guiahi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  H-H Chiang; Y-M Yu Chao; Y-S Yuh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Supporting Women's Autonomy in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Josephine Johnston; Ruth M Farrell; Erik Parens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: the perspectives of parents of individuals with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Angela Inglis; Catriona Hippman; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Stephanie A Kraft; Mollie A Minear; Roberta R Ryan; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13

9.  Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Anthony R Gregg; Brian G Skotko; Judith L Benkendorf; Kristin G Monaghan; Komal Bajaj; Robert G Best; Susan Klugman; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  The Legal Past, Present and Future of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Professional Liability and Other Legal Challenges Affecting Patient Access to Services.

Authors:  Deborah Pergament; Katie Ilijic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.