Literature DB >> 16642844

Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system.

John H Grose1, Joseph W Hall, Emily Buss.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that temporal processing deficits are evident in the pre-senescent (middle-aged) auditory system for listening tasks that involve brief stimuli, across-frequency-channel processing, and/or significant processing loads. A gap duration discrimination (GDD) task was employed that used either fixed-duration gap markers (experiment 1) or random-duration markers (experiment 2). Independent variables included standard gap duration (0, 35, and 250 ms), marker frequency (within- and across-frequency), and task complexity. A total of 18 young and 23 middle-aged listeners with normal hearing participated in the GDD experiments. Middle age was defined operationally as 40-55 years of age. The results indicated that middle-aged listeners performed more poorly than the young listeners in general, and that this deficit was sometimes, but not always, exacerbated by increases in task complexity. A third experiment employed a categorical perception task that measured the gap duration associated with a perceptual boundary. The results from 12 young and 12 middle-aged listeners with normal hearing indicated that the categorical boundary was associated with shorter gaps in the young listeners. The results of these experiments indicate that temporal processing deficits can be observed relatively early in the aging process, and are evident in middle age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16642844      PMCID: PMC2312389          DOI: 10.1121/1.2172169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.

Authors:  A Strouse; D H Ashmead; R N Ohde; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Auditory gap detection, perceptual channels, and temporal resolution in speech perception.

Authors:  D P Phillips
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects.

Authors:  N J He; A R Horwitz; J R Dubno; J H Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition.

Authors:  K B Snell; D R Frisina
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners.

Authors:  B A Schneider; S J Hamstra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of gap and marker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation.

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall; E Buss
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-12

7.  Age-related dopamine D2/D3 receptor loss in extrastriatal regions of the human brain.

Authors:  V Kaasinen; H Vilkman; J Hietala; K Någren; H Helenius; H Olsson; L Farde; J Rinne
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination.

Authors:  Jennifer Lister; Joan Besing; Janet Koehnke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.

Authors:  Jennifer Lister; Kenton Tarver
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Effects of age on dopamine transporters in healthy humans.

Authors:  P D Mozley; P D Acton; E D Barraclough; K Plössl; R C Gur; A Alavi; A Mathur; J Saffer; H F Kung
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  44 in total

1.  Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-03

2.  Gap duration discrimination for frequency-asymmetric gap markers: psychophysical and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of temporal cues in word identification by younger and older adults: effects of sentence context.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace Yeni-Komshian; Peter Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Age effects in discrimination of repeating sequence intervals.

Authors:  Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Age effects in discrimination of intervals within rhythmic tone sequences.

Authors:  Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of Stimulation Rate on Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Nicole Nguyen; Miranda Cleary; Ronna Hertzano; David J Eisenman; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.