Literature DB >> 19045808

The role of temporal cues in word identification by younger and older adults: effects of sentence context.

Sandra Gordon-Salant1, Grace Yeni-Komshian, Peter Fitzgibbons.   

Abstract

Prior investigations, using isolated words as stimuli, have shown that older listeners tend to require longer temporal cues than younger listeners to switch their percept from one word to its phonetically contrasting counterpart. The extent to which this age effect occurs in sentence contexts is investigated in the present study. The hypothesis was that perception of temporal cues differs for words presented in isolation and a sentence context and that this effect may vary between younger and older listeners. Younger and older listeners with normal-hearing and older listeners with hearing loss identified phonetically contrasting word pairs in natural speech continua that varied by a single temporal cue: voice-onset time, vowel duration, transition duration, and silent interval duration. The words were presented in isolation and in sentences. A context effect was shown for most continua, in which listeners required longer temporal cues in sentences than in isolated words. Additionally, older listeners required longer cues at the crossover points than younger listeners for most but not all continua. In general, the findings support the conclusion that older listeners tend to require longer target temporal cues than younger normal-hearing listeners in identifying phonetically contrasting word pairs in isolation and sentence contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045808      PMCID: PMC2736723          DOI: 10.1121/1.2982409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Fast noisy speech: age differences in processing rapid speech with background noise.

Authors:  P A Tun
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

Review 2.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Gap detection as a function of stimulus bandwidth with fixed high-frequency cutoff in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  J H Grose; D A Eddins; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sample.

Authors:  S A Gelfand; T Schwander; S Silman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-05

6.  Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  S E Hargus; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-02

7.  The perception of English and Spanish vowels by native English and Spanish listeners: a multidimensional scaling analysis.

Authors:  R A Fox; J E Flege; M J Munro
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider; M Daneman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-06
View more
  17 in total

1.  Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of Aging on Perceptual and Electrophysiological Responses to Acoustic Pulse Trains as a Function of Rate.

Authors:  Casey Gaskins; Brittany N Jaekel; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech Rate Normalization and Phonemic Boundary Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Erin J Pickett; Peter J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Electrophysiologic Assessment of Auditory Training Benefits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Kimberly Jenkins
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

7.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

8.  Age Effects on Neural Representation and Perception of Silence Duration Cues in Speech.

Authors:  Lindsey Roque; Casey Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Erin P Walter; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Roles of voice onset time and F0 in stop consonant voicing perception: effects of masking noise and low-pass filtering.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.