Literature DB >> 10420628

Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners.

B A Schneider1, S J Hamstra.   

Abstract

Twenty normal hearing younger and twenty older adults in the early stages of presbycusis, but with relatively normal hearing at 2 kHz, were asked to discriminate between the presence versus absence of a gap between two equal-duration tonal markers. The duration of each marker was constant within a block of trials but varied between 0.83 and 500 ms across blocks. Notched-noise, centered at 2 kHz, was used to mask on- and off-transients. Gap detection thresholds of older adults were markedly higher than those of younger adults for marker durations of less than 250 ms but converged on those of younger adults at 500 ms. For both age groups, gap detection thresholds were independent of audiometric thresholds. These results indicate that older adults have more difficulty detecting a gap than younger adults when short marker durations (i.e., durations characteristic of speech sounds) are employed. It is shown that these results cannot be explained by linear models of temporal processing but are consistent with differential adaptation effects in younger and older adults.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10420628     DOI: 10.1121/1.427062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  51 in total

1.  Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

3.  Gap duration discrimination for frequency-asymmetric gap markers: psychophysical and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Adam R Kaiser; Ted A Meyer; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Age effects in discrimination of repeating sequence intervals.

Authors:  Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 9.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11

10.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.