Literature DB >> 12083214

Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination.

Jennifer Lister1, Joan Besing, Janet Koehnke.   

Abstract

Temporal discrimination was measured using a gap discrimination paradigm for three groups of listeners with normal hearing: (1) ages 18-30, (2) ages 40-52, and (3) ages 62-74 years. Normal hearing was defined as pure-tone thresholds < or = 25 dB HL from 250 to 6000 Hz and < or = 30 dB HL at 8000 Hz. Silent gaps were placed between 1/4-octave bands of noise centered at one of six frequencies. The noise band markers were paired so that the center frequency of the leading marker was fixed at 2000 Hz, and the center frequency of the trailing marker varied randomly across experimental runs. Gap duration discrimination was significantly poorer for older listeners than for young and middle-aged listeners, and the performance of the young and middle-aged listeners did not differ significantly. Age group differences were more apparent for the more frequency-disparate stimuli (2000-Hz leading marker followed by a 500-Hz trailing marker) than for the fixed-frequency stimuli (2000-Hz lead and 2000-Hz trail). The gap duration difference limens of the older listeners increased more rapidly with frequency disparity than those of the other listeners. Because age effects were more apparent for the more frequency-disparate conditions, and gap discrimination was not affected by differences in hearing sensitivity among listeners, it is suggested that gap discrimination depends upon temporal mechanisms that deteriorate with age and stimulus complexity but are unaffected by hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12083214     DOI: 10.1121/1.1476685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Age effects in discrimination of repeating sequence intervals.

Authors:  Peter J Fitzgibbons; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Sara Wilson; Mark A Eckert; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Reduced GABA(A) receptor-mediated tonic inhibition in aged rat auditory thalamus.

Authors:  Ben D Richardson; Lynne L Ling; Victor V Uteshev; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11

8.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-24

10.  Gap detection and temporal modulation transfer function as behavioral estimates of auditory temporal acuity using band-limited stimuli in young and older adults.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.