Literature DB >> 16636787

Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation.

Warren G Darling1, Steven L Wolf, Andrew J Butler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine whether motor cortex excitability assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is less variable when subjects maintain a visually controlled low-level contraction of the muscle of interest. We also examined the dependence of single motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level using linear and non-linear multiple regression analysis. Eight healthy adult subjects received single pulse TMS over the left motor cortex at a point where minimal stimulation intensity was required to produce MEPs in extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Voluntary activation of the muscle was controlled by visual display of a target force (indicated by a stable line on an oscilloscope) and the isometric force produced as the subject attempted to extend the fingers (indicated by a line on the oscilloscope representing the finger extension force) while subjects were instructed to: exert zero extension force (0%) and produce forces equal to 5 and 10% of maximum voluntary finger extension under separate conditions. Relative variability (coefficient of variation) of single MEPs at a constant stimulus intensity and of pre-stimulus muscle EMG was lower during maintained 5 and 10% contractions than at 0% contraction levels. Therefore, maintaining a stable low intensity contraction helps stabilize cortical and spinal excitability. Multiple regression analyses showed that a linear dependence of single MEPs on stimulation intensity and pre-stimulus muscle activation level produced similar fits to those for a non-linear dependence on stimulus intensity and a linear dependence on pre-stimulus EMG. Thus, a simple linear method can be used to assess dependence of single MEP amplitudes on both stimulus intensity (to characterize slope of the recruitment curve) and low intensity background muscle activation level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16636787      PMCID: PMC3582032          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Long-term changes of GABAergic function in the sensorimotor cortex of amputees. A combined magnetic stimulation and 11C-flumazenil PET study.

Authors:  C Capaday; M P Richardson; J C Rothwell; D J Brooks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Proposed cortical and sub-cortical contributions to the long-latency stretch reflex in the forearm.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Melody A Polych; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex.

Authors:  V E Amassian; G J Quirk; M Stewart
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Excitatory and inhibitory effects of magnetic coil stimulation of human cortex.

Authors:  R Q Cracco; V E Amassian; P J MacCabee; J B Cracco
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1990

5.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  L Kiers; D Cros; K H Chiappa; J Fang
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12

6.  Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  A method for simulating the reflex output of a motoneuron pool.

Authors:  C Capaday; R B Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Abnormal muscle activation characteristics associated with loss of dexterity after stroke.

Authors:  C G Canning; L Ada; N J O'Dwyer
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Changes in serial optical topography and TMS during task performance after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke: a case study.

Authors:  Si-Woon Park; Andrew J Butler; Vanessa Cavalheiro; Jay L Alberts; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Finger extensor variability in TMS parameters among chronic stroke patients.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Shannon Kahn; Steven L Wolf; Paul Weiss
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  64 in total

1.  Neural summation in human motor cortex by subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Malle A Tagamets; Laura M Rowland; Peter Kochunov; Paul Shepard; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Intra subject variation and correlation of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  K Roy Choudhury; L Boyle; M Burke; W Lombard; S Ryan; B McNamara
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict motor-inhibitory performance.

Authors:  Jason L He; I Fuelscher; J Coxon; N Chowdhury; Wei-Peng Teo; P Barhoun; P Enticott; C Hyde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Characterizing differential poststroke corticomotor drive to the dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles during resting and volitional muscle activation.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Ryan Zarzycki; Susanne M Morton; Trisha M Kesar; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Threshold position control of anticipation in humans: a possible role of corticospinal influences.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Nicolas A Turpin; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Individual Differences in Resting Corticospinal Excitability Are Correlated with Reaction Time and GABA Content in Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse; Maedbh King; Sean Noah; Richard J Maddock; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 8.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  N100 as a generic cortical electrophysiological marker based on decomposition of TMS-evoked potentials across five anatomic locations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Laura M Rowland; Joshua Chiappelli; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Corticospinal and transcallosal modulation of unilateral and bilateral contractions of lower limbs.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Ruben Perellón Alfonso; Neil Cronin; Jure Bon; Vojko Strojnik; Janne Avela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.