Literature DB >> 28560812

Threshold position control of anticipation in humans: a possible role of corticospinal influences.

Lei Zhang1,2, Nicolas A Turpin1,2, Anatol G Feldman1,2.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Sudden unloading of preloaded wrist muscles elicits motion to a new wrist position. Such motion is prevented if subjects unload muscles using the contralateral arm (self-unloading). Corticospinal influences originated from the primary motor cortex maintain tonic influences on motoneurons of wrist muscles before sudden unloading but modify these influences prior to the onset and until the end of self-unloading. Results are interpreted based on the previous finding that intentional actions are caused by central, particularly corticospinal, shifts in the spatial thresholds at which wrist motoneurons are activated, thus predetermining the attractor point at which the neuromuscular periphery achieves mechanical balance with environment forces. By maintaining or shifting the thresholds, descending systems let body segments go to the equilibrium position in the respective unloading tasks without the pre-programming of kinematics or muscle activation patterns. The study advances the understanding of how motor actions in general, and anticipation in particular, are controlled. ABSTRACT: The role of corticospinal (CS) pathways in anticipatory motor actions was evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex projecting to motoneurons (MNs) of wrist muscles. Preloaded wrist flexors were suddenly unloaded by the experimenter or by the subject using the other hand (self-unloading). After sudden unloading, the wrist joint involuntarily flexed to a new position. In contrast, during self-unloading the wrist remained almost motionless, implying that an anticipatory postural adjustment occurred. In the self-unloading task, anticipation was manifested by a decrease in descending facilitation of pre-activated flexor MNs starting ∼72 ms before changes in the background EMG activity. Descending facilitation of extensor MNs began to increase ∼61 ms later. Conversely, these influences remained unchanged before sudden unloading, implying the absence of anticipation. We also tested TMS responses during EMG silent periods produced by brief muscle shortening, transiently resulting in similar EMG levels before the onset and after the end of self-unloading. We found reduced descending facilitation of flexor MNs after self-unloading. To explain why the wrist excursion was minimized in self-unloading due to these changes in descending influences, we relied on previous demonstrations that descending systems pre-set the threshold positions of body segments at which muscles begin to be activated, thus predetermining the equilibrium point to which the system is attracted. Based on this notion, a more consistent explanation of the kinematic, EMG and descending patterns in the two types of unloading is proposed compared to the alternative notion of direct pre-programming of kinematic and/or EMG patterns.
© 2017 Université de Montréal. The Journal of Physiology © 2017 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioural neuroscience; control variables; motor cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28560812      PMCID: PMC5538209          DOI: 10.1113/JP274309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  57 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Functional differences in corticospinal projections from macaque primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Roger N Lemon; M A Maier; J Armand; Peter A Kirkwood; H W Yang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Interruption of motor programmes by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in man.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Cortical preparatory activity: representation of movement or first cog in a dynamical machine?

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; John P Cunningham; Matthew T Kaufman; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Implicit learning and generalization of stretch response modulation in humans.

Authors:  Nicolas A Turpin; Mindy F Levin; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Distribution of corticospinal neurons with collaterals to the lower brain stem reticular formation in monkey (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  K Keizer; H G Kuypers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Major role for sensory feedback in soleus EMG activity in the stance phase of walking in man.

Authors:  T Sinkjaer; J B Andersen; M Ladouceur; L O Christensen; J B Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Evidence for two concurrent inhibitory mechanisms during response preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; David Lew; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Etienne Olivier; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Mapping of cortical sites where transcranial magnetic stimulation results in delay of voluntary movement.

Authors:  J L Taylor; D S Wagener; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Vestibular and corticospinal control of human body orientation in the gravitational field.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Referent control of the orientation of posture and movement in the gravitational field.

Authors:  Aditi A Mullick; Nicolas A Turpin; Szu-Chen Hsu; Sandeep K Subramanian; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Eye and head movements and vestibulo-ocular reflex in the context of indirect, referent control of motor actions.

Authors:  Anatol G Feldman; Lei Zhang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.