Literature DB >> 16633939

Sound representation methods for spectro-temporal receptive field estimation.

Patrick Gill1, Junli Zhang, Sarah M N Woolley, Thane Fremouw, Frédéric E Theunissen.   

Abstract

The spectro-temporal receptive field (STRF) of an auditory neuron describes the linear relationship between the sound stimulus in a time-frequency representation and the neural response. Time-frequency representations of a sound in turn require a nonlinear operation on the sound pressure waveform and many different forms for this non-linear transformation are possible. Here, we systematically investigated the effects of four factors in the non-linear step in the STRF model: the choice of logarithmic or linear filter frequency spacing, the time-frequency scale, stimulus amplitude compression and adaptive gain control. We quantified the goodness of fit of these different STRF models on data obtained from auditory neurons in the songbird midbrain and forebrain. We found that adaptive gain control and the correct stimulus amplitude compression scheme are paramount to correctly modelling neurons. The time-frequency scale and frequency spacing also affected the goodness of fit of the model but to a lesser extent and the optimal values were stimulus dependent.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633939     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-006-7059-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  30 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal response field characterization with dynamic ripples in ferret primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  D A Depireux; J Z Simon; D J Klein; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Efficient coding of natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1956-03

5.  Quantifying variability in neural responses and its application for the validation of model predictions.

Authors:  Anne Hsu; Alexander Borst; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Network       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.273

6.  Spectral envelope coding in cat primary auditory cortex: linear and non-linear effects of stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  B M Calhoun; C E Schreiner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons.

Authors:  R C deCharms; D T Blake; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Responses of single neurons in cat auditory cortex to time-varying stimuli: linear amplitude modulations.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intensity coding in the auditory periphery of the cat: responses of cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in the presence of bandstop masking noise.

Authors:  A R Palmer; E F Evans
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The spectro-temporal receptive field. A functional characteristic of auditory neurons.

Authors:  A M Aertsen; P I Johannesma
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  49 in total

1.  Characterizing responses of translation-invariant neurons to natural stimuli: maximally informative invariant dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Ryan J Rowekamp; Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Automating the design of informative sequences of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewi; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Integration over multiple timescales in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Linear and nonlinear auditory response properties of interneurons in a high-order avian vocal motor nucleus during wakefulness.

Authors:  Jonathan N Raksin; Christopher M Glaze; Sarah Smith; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Lars A Holmstrom; Lonneke B M Eeuwes; Patrick D Roberts; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Organizing principles of spectro-temporal encoding in the avian primary auditory area field L.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Long-lasting context dependence constrains neural encoding models in rodent auditory cortex.

Authors:  Hiroki Asari; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Anesthetic state modulates excitability but not spectral tuning or neural discrimination in single auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Joseph W Schumacher; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Rapid synaptic depression explains nonlinear modulation of spectro-temporal tuning in primary auditory cortex by natural stimuli.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.