Literature DB >> 19295144

Rapid synaptic depression explains nonlinear modulation of spectro-temporal tuning in primary auditory cortex by natural stimuli.

Stephen V David1, Nima Mesgarani, Jonathan B Fritz, Shihab A Shamma.   

Abstract

In this study, we explored ways to account more accurately for responses of neurons in primary auditory cortex (A1) to natural sounds. The auditory cortex has evolved to extract behaviorally relevant information from complex natural sounds, but most of our understanding of its function is derived from experiments using simple synthetic stimuli. Previous neurophysiological studies have found that existing models, such as the linear spectro-temporal receptive field (STRF), fail to capture the entire functional relationship between natural stimuli and neural responses. To study this problem, we compared STRFs for A1 neurons estimated using a natural stimulus, continuous speech, with STRFs estimated using synthetic ripple noise. For about one-third of the neurons, we found significant differences between STRFs, usually in the temporal dynamics of inhibition and/or overall gain. This shift in tuning resulted primarily from differences in the coarse temporal structure of the speech and noise stimuli. Using simulations, we found that the stimulus dependence of spectro-temporal tuning can be explained by a model in which synaptic inputs to A1 neurons are susceptible to rapid nonlinear depression. This dynamic reshaping of spectro-temporal tuning suggests that synaptic depression may enable efficient encoding of natural auditory stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19295144      PMCID: PMC2774136          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5249-08.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  36 in total

1.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatial structure of complex cell receptive fields measured with natural images.

Authors:  Jon Touryan; Gidon Felsen; Yang Dan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Synaptic mechanisms of forward suppression in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Spectrotemporal receptive fields in anesthetized cat primary auditory cortex are context dependent.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Arnaud Noreña; Gregory Shaw; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  M Carandini; D J Heeger; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural networks with dynamic synapses.

Authors:  M Tsodyks; K Pawelzik; H Markram
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons.

Authors:  R C deCharms; D T Blake; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. I. Characteristics of single-unit responses to moving ripple spectra.

Authors:  N Kowalski; D A Depireux; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Functional organization of ferret auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Fernando R Nodal; Israel Nelken; Andrew J King
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Synaptic depression and the temporal response characteristics of V1 cells.

Authors:  F S Chance; S B Nelson; L F Abbott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  74 in total

1.  Receptive field dimensionality increases from the auditory midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Inferring the role of inhibition in auditory processing of complex natural stimuli.

Authors:  Nadja Schinkel-Bielefeld; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma; Daniel A Butts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A quantitative analysis of information about past and present stimuli encoded by spikes of A1 neurons.

Authors:  Stefan Klampfl; Stephen V David; Pingbo Yin; Shihab A Shamma; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Rapid Task-Related Plasticity of Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Auditory Midbrain.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; L Elliot Hong; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Adaptive auditory computations.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Jonathan Fritz
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Diverse effects of stimulus history in waking mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth A K Phillips; Christoph E Schreiner; Andrea R Hasenstaub
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Task Engagement Improves Neural Discriminability in the Auditory Midbrain of the Marmoset Monkey.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Sean J Slee; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.