Literature DB >> 20024651

Egocentric and allocentric reference frames for catching a falling object.

Anne Brec'hed Le Séac'h1, Patrice Senot, Joseph McIntyre.   

Abstract

When programming movement, one must account for gravitational acceleration. This is particularly important when catching a falling object because the task requires a precise estimate of time-to-contact. Knowledge of gravity's effects is intimately linked to our definition of 'up' and 'down'. Both directions can be described in an allocentric reference frame, based on visual and/or gravitational cues, or in an egocentric reference frame in which the body axis is taken as vertical. To test which frame humans use to predict gravity's effect, we asked participants to intercept virtual balls approaching from above or below with artificially controlled acceleration that could be congruent or not with gravity. To dissociate between these frames, subjects were seated upright (trunk parallel to gravity) or lying down (body axis orthogonal to the gravitational axis). We report data in line with the use of an allocentric reference frame and discuss its relevance depending on available gravity-related cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024651     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2081-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual processing of optic acceleration.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; H P Snippe; A Toet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Internal model of gravity for hand interception: parametric adaptation to zero-gravity visual targets on Earth.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Two reference frames for visual perception in two gravity conditions.

Authors:  Mark Lipshits; Ana Bengoetxea; Guy Cheron; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 5.  Internal models and prediction of visual gravitational motion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Manual interception of moving targets. I. Performance and movement initiation.

Authors:  N L Port; D Lee; P Dassonville; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.

Authors:  J R Tresilian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

10.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Weightlessness alters up/down asymmetries in the perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Caty De Saedeleer; Manuel Vidal; Mark Lipshits; Ana Bengoetxea; Ana Maria Cebolla; Alain Berthoz; Guy Cheron; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Familiar trajectories facilitate the interpretation of physical forces when intercepting a moving target.

Authors:  Antonija Mijatović; Barbara La Scaleia; Nicola Mercuri; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Perceived object stability depends on multisensory estimates of gravity.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Roland W Fleming; Manish Singh; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The embodied dynamics of perceptual causality: a slippery slope?

Authors:  Michel-Ange Amorim; Isabelle A Siegler; Robin Baurès; Armando M Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-21

Review 6.  Watching the Effects of Gravity. Vestibular Cortex and the Neural Representation of "Visual" Gravity.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Iole Indovina; Myrka Zago; Elena Daprati; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 7.  Visual gravitational motion and the vestibular system in humans.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco; Iole Indovina; Barbara La Scaleia; Vincenzo Maffei; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-26

8.  Contributions of Body-Orientation to Mental Ball Dropping Task During Out-of-Body Experiences.

Authors:  Ege Tekgün; Burak Erdeniz
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.