Literature DB >> 16622696

Magnetic versus manual guidewire manipulation in neuroradiology: in vitro results.

T Krings1, J Finney, P Niggemann, P Reinacher, N Lück, A Drexler, J Lovell, A Meyer, R Sehra, P Schauerte, M Reinges, F J Hans, A Thron.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Standard microguidewires used in interventional neuroradiology have a predefined shape of the tip that cannot be changed while the guidewire is in the vessel. We evaluated a novel magnetic navigation system (MNS) that generates a magnetic field to control the deflection of a microguidewire that can be used to reshape the guidewire tip in vivo without removing the wire from the body, thereby potentially facilitating navigation along tortuous paths or multiple acute curves.
METHOD: The MNS consists of two permanent magnets positioned on either side of the fluoroscopy table that create a constant precisely controlled magnetic field in the defined region of interest. This field enables omnidirectional rotation of a 0.014-inch magnetic microguidewire (MG). Speed of navigation, accuracy in a tortuous vessel anatomy and the potential for navigating into in vitro aneurysms were tested by four investigators with differing experience in neurointervention and compared to navigation with a standard, manually controlled microguidewire (SG).
RESULTS: Navigation using MG was faster (P=0.0056) and more accurate (0.2 mistakes per trial vs. 2.6 mistakes per trial) only in less-experienced investigators. There were no statistically significant differences between the MG and the SG in the hands of experienced investigators. One aneurysm with an acute angulation from the carrier vessel could be navigated only with the MG while the SG failed, even after multiple reshaping manoeuvres.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that magnetic navigation seems to be easier, more accurate and faster in the hands of less-experienced investigators. We consider that the features of the MNS may improve the efficacy and safety of challenging neurointerventional procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16622696     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-006-0082-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic catheter manipulation.

Authors:  Mitchell N Faddis; Bruce D Lindsay
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.439

2.  Experimental study of the magnetic stereotaxis system for catheter manipulation within the brain.

Authors:  M S Grady; M A Howard; R G Dacey; W Blume; M Lawson; P Werp; R C Ritter
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Selective angiography of the abdominal aorta with a guided catheter.

Authors:  H TILLANDER
Journal:  Acta radiol       Date:  1956-01       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: experimental results in a phantom.

Authors:  Mirko Schiemann; Reinmar Killmann; Martin Kleen; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Jennifer Finney; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Heart catheterization in a neonate by interacting magnetic fields: a new and simple method of catheter guidance.

Authors:  W Ram; H Meyer
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1991-04

6.  Remote catheter ablation of parahisian accessory pathways using a novel magnetic navigation system--a report of two cases.

Authors:  Sabine Ernst; Hitoshi Hachiya; Julian K R Chun; Feifan Ouyang
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06

7.  Magnetic guidance of a catheter with articulated steel tip.

Authors:  H TILLANDER
Journal:  Acta radiol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  A new magnet system for 'intravascular navigation'.

Authors:  S B Yodh; N T Pierce; R J Weggel; D B Montgomery
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1968-03

9.  A refined method for creating saccular aneurysms in the rabbit.

Authors:  Timo Krings; Walter Möller-Hartmann; Franz-Josef Hans; Ruth Thiex; Anna Brunn; Kira Scherer; Alexander Meetz; Heiko Dreeskamp; Klaus-Peter Stein; Joachim M Gilsbach; Armin Thron
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system: magnetic remote catheter ablation.

Authors:  Sabine Ernst; Feifan Ouyang; Christian Linder; Klaus Hertting; Fabian Stahl; Julian Chun; Hitoshi Hachiya; Dietmar Bänsch; Matthias Antz; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  9 in total

1.  Neuroendovascular magnetic navigation: clinical experience in ten patients.

Authors:  Guilherme Dabus; Ronald J Gerstle; Dewitte T Cross; Colin P Derdeyn; Christopher J Moran
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A Magnetically Controlled Soft Microrobot Steering a Guidewire in a Three-Dimensional Phantom Vascular Network.

Authors:  Sungwoong Jeon; Ali Kafash Hoshiar; Kangho Kim; Seungmin Lee; Eunhee Kim; Sunkey Lee; Jin-Young Kim; Bradley J Nelson; Hyo-Jeong Cha; Byung-Ju Yi; Hongsoo Choi
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation.

Authors:  Yoonho Kim; Emily Genevriere; Pablo Harker; Jaehun Choe; Marcin Balicki; Robert W Regenhardt; Justin E Vranic; Adam A Dmytriw; Aman B Patel; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  Magnetic catheter manipulation in the interventional MR imaging environment.

Authors:  Mark W Wilson; Alastair B Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D Losey; Erin J Yee; Anthony Bernhardt; Vincent Malba; Lee Evans; Ryan Sincic; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L Arenson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 5.  Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI.

Authors:  Leah Muller; Maythem Saeed; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 6.  A Review of Robotic Interventional Neuroradiology.

Authors:  C B Beaman; N Kaneko; P M Meyers; S Tateshima
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.966

Review 7.  Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots.

Authors:  Yoonho Kim; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 72.087

8.  Flow driven robotic navigation of microengineered endovascular probes.

Authors:  Lucio Pancaldi; Pietro Dirix; Adele Fanelli; Augusto Martins Lima; Nikolaos Stergiopulos; Pascal John Mosimann; Diego Ghezzi; Mahmut Selman Sakar
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Bailout Strategies and Complications Associated with the Use of Flow-Diverting Stents for Treating Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Fawaz Al-Mufti; Eric R Cohen; Krishna Amuluru; Vikas Patel; Mohammad El-Ghanem; Rolla Nuoman; Neil Majmundar; Neha S Dangayach; Philip M Meyers
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-10-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.