Literature DB >> 33541906

A Review of Robotic Interventional Neuroradiology.

C B Beaman1, N Kaneko2, P M Meyers3, S Tateshima2.   

Abstract

Robotic interventional neuroradiology is an emerging field with the potential to enhance patient safety, reduce occupational hazards, and expand systems of care. Endovascular robots allow the operator to precisely control guidewires and catheters from a lead-shielded cockpit located several feet (or potentially hundreds of miles) from the patient. This has opened up the possibility of expanding telestroke networks to patients without access to life-saving procedures such as stroke thrombectomy and cerebral aneurysm occlusion by highly-experienced physicians. The prototype machines, first developed in the early 2000s, have evolved into machines capable of a broad range of techniques, while incorporating newly automated maneuvers and safety algorithms. In recent years, preliminary clinical research has been published demonstrating the safety and feasibility of the technology in cerebral angiography and intracranial intervention. The next step is to conduct larger, multisite, prospective studies to assess generalizability and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes in neurovascular disease.
© 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33541906      PMCID: PMC8115357          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   4.966


  52 in total

1.  Concept, design and pre-clinical studies for remote control percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Rafael Beyar; Tal Wenderow; Doron Lindner; Ganesh Kumar; Rona Shofti
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.534

2.  Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Strokes: Current US Access Paradigms and Optimization Methodology.

Authors:  Amrou Sarraj; Sean Savitz; Deep Pujara; Haris Kamal; Kirsten Carroll; Faris Shaker; Sujan Reddy; Kaushik Parsha; Lauren E Fournier; Erica M Jones; Anjail Sharrief; Sheryl Martin-Schild; James Grotta
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Every 15-min delay in recanalization by intra-arterial therapy in acute ischemic stroke increases risk of poor outcome.

Authors:  Anna H He; Leonid Churilov; Peter J Mitchell; Richard J Dowling; Bernard Yan
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.266

4.  TeleStroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas: 10-year experience of the TeleMedical project for integrative stroke care.

Authors:  Peter Müller-Barna; Gordian J Hubert; Sandra Boy; Ulrich Bogdahn; Silke Wiedmann; Peter U Heuschmann; Heinrich J Audebert
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Jacob Goldstein; Olivier Bar
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.534

6.  Robotic assisted carotid artery stenting for the treatment of symptomatic carotid disease: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

Authors:  Raul G Nogueira; Rajesh Sachdeva; Alhamza R Al-Bayati; Mahmoud H Mohammaden; Michael R Frankel; Diogo C Haussen
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 7.  Application of emerging technologies to improve access to ischemic stroke care.

Authors:  Shawn M Vuong; Christopher P Carroll; Ryan D Tackla; William J Jeong; Andrew J Ringer
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Higher Annual Operator Volume Is Associated With Better Reperfusion Rates in Stroke Patients Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy: The ETIS Registry.

Authors:  Rody El Nawar; Bertrand Lapergue; Michel Piotin; Benjamin Gory; Raphael Blanc; Arturo Consoli; Georges Rodesch; Mikael Mazighi; Frederic Bourdain; Maéva Kyheng; Julien Labreuche; Fernando Pico
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Cancer Risks in U.S. Radiologic Technologists Working With Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures, 1994-2008.

Authors:  Preetha Rajaraman; Michele M Doody; Chu Ling Yu; Dale L Preston; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; D Michal Freedman; Bruce H Alexander; Mark P Little; Donald L Miller; Martha S Linet
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience.

Authors:  Tejas M Patel; Sanjay C Shah; Samir B Pancholy
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-09-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  An Endovascular Catheterization Robotic System Using Collaborative Operation with Magnetically Controlled Haptic Force Feedback.

Authors:  Xinming Li; Shuxiang Guo; Peng Shi; Xiaoliang Jin; Masahiko Kawanishi
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 2.  Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Endovascular Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Javier Bravo; Arvin R Wali; Brian R Hirshman; Tilvawala Gopesh; Jeffrey A Steinberg; Bernard Yan; J Scott Pannell; Alexander Norbash; James Friend; Alexander A Khalessi; David Santiago-Dieppa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 3.  Robotics in neurointerventional surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  William Crinnion; Ben Jackson; Avnish Sood; Jeremy Lynch; Christos Bergeles; Hongbin Liu; Kawal Rhode; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Thomas C Booth
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.572

4.  Pilot Animal Study on Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Visceral Interventions.

Authors:  Patrick A Kupczyk; Ulrike I Attenberger; Carsten Meyer; Julian A Luetkens; Daniel Kuetting
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.797

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.