Literature DB >> 18319073

Using the optimal receiver operating characteristic curve to design a predictive genetic test, exemplified with type 2 diabetes.

Qing Lu1, Robert C Elston.   

Abstract

Current extensive genetic research into common complex diseases, especially with the completion of genome-wide association studies, is bringing to light many novel genetic risk loci. These new discoveries, along with previously known genetic risk variants, offer an important opportunity for researchers to improve health care. We describe a method of quick evaluation of these new findings for potential clinical practice by designing a new predictive genetic test, estimating its classification accuracy, and determining the sample size required for the verification of this accuracy. The proposed predictive test is asymptotically more powerful than tests built on any other existing method and can be extended to scenarios where loci are linked or interact. We illustrate the approach for the case of type 2 diabetes. We incorporate recently discovered risk factors into the proposed test and find a potentially better predictive genetic test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the proposed test is estimated to be higher (AUC = 0.671) than for the existing test (AUC = 0.580).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18319073      PMCID: PMC2664997          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  29 in total

Review 1.  The complexities of predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  J P Evans; C Skrzynia; W Burke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

2.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Decomposing multilocus linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Root Gorelick; Manfred D Laubichler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Revisiting the clinical validity of multiplex genetic testing in complex diseases.

Authors:  A Cecile J W Janssens; M Carolina Pardo; Ewout W Steyerberg; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art.

Authors:  J A Hanley
Journal:  Crit Rev Diagn Imaging       Date:  1989

6.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Signal detectability and medical decision-making.

Authors:  L B Lusted
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Identifying combinations of cancer markers for further study as triggers of early intervention.

Authors:  S G Baker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Improving the prediction of complex diseases by testing for multiple disease-susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Quanhe Yang; Muin J Khoury; Lorenzo Botto; J M Friedman; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 10.  Genetics and genomics in practice: the continuum from genetic disease to genetic information in health and disease.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  41 in total

1.  Analytical and simulation methods for estimating the potential predictive ability of genetic profiling: a comparison of methods and results.

Authors:  Suman Kundu; Lennart C Karssen; A Cecile J W Janssens
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Annotating individual human genomes.

Authors:  Ali Torkamani; Ashley A Scott-Van Zeeland; Eric J Topol; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 3.  Beyond odds ratios--communicating disease risk based on genetic profiles.

Authors:  Peter Kraft; Sholom Wacholder; Marilyn C Cornelis; Frank B Hu; Richard B Hayes; Gilles Thomas; Robert Hoover; David J Hunter; Stephen Chanock
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Gene × environment interactions in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Paul W Franks
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Improved risk prediction for Crohn's disease with a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Jia Kang; Subra Kugathasan; Michel Georges; Hongyu Zhao; Judy H Cho
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score.

Authors:  Yiwey Shieh; Donglei Hu; Lin Ma; Scott Huntsman; Charlotte C Gard; Jessica W T Leung; Jeffrey A Tice; Celine M Vachon; Steven R Cummings; Karla Kerlikowske; Elad Ziv
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  A Three-Way Interaction among Maternal and Fetal Variants Contributing to Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Ming Li; Jingyun Li; Changshuai Wei; Qing Lu; Xinyu Tang; Stephen W Erickson; Stewart L MacLeod; Charlotte A Hobbs
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  Family-based genetic risk prediction of multifactorial disease.

Authors:  Douglas M Ruderfer; Joshua Korn; Shaun M Purcell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Evaluation of an optimal receiver operating characteristic procedure.

Authors:  Neal Jeffries; Gang Zheng
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-12-15

10.  The effect of multiple genetic variants in predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Qing Lu; Yeunjoo Song; Xuefeng Wang; Sungho Won; Yuehua Cui; Robert C Elston
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2009-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.