Literature DB >> 16215867

Patient perspectives on research recruitment through cancer registries.

Laura M Beskow1, Robert S Sandler, Robert C Millikan, Morris Weinberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To gain preliminary insight into patients' levels of awareness and preferences about research recruitment through cancer registries.
METHODS: We developed four questions about the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry's educational brochure and about patient preferences regarding physician involvement in research recruitment. These questions were included in the baseline interview conducted among 100 consecutively enrolled participants in the North Carolina Colorectal Cancer Care Outcomes Research Study, an ongoing observational study.
RESULTS: Patients who read the Registry's educational brochure generally reported that it helped them understand that a researcher could contact them, but only about one-fourth of patients recalled receiving and reading the brochure. Over two-thirds of patients said they preferred that researchers contact them directly about their interest in research participation, rather than checking with their physician first. Among patients who wanted their physician involved, most preferred a physician notification rather than a physician permission approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Registry policies about patient education and physician involvement can have an important impact on researchers' ability to conduct population-based studies. Understanding patient perspectives is key to developing balanced policies that protect patients' privacy, as well as facilitate their opportunities to make autonomous decisions about participating in research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16215867     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-005-0407-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  17 in total

1.  Donation intentions for cancer genetics research among African Americans.

Authors:  Jasmine A McDonald; Benita Weathers; Frances K Barg; Andrea B Troxel; Judy A Shea; Deborah Bowen; Carmen E Guerra; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-01-06

2.  An automated communication system in a contact registry for persons with rare diseases: scalable tools for identifying and recruiting clinical research participants.

Authors:  R L Richesson; H S Lee; D Cuthbertson; J Lloyd; K Young; J P Krischer
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  University of Hawai'i Cancer Center connection: The vital role of cancer registries in the recruitment of an understudied minority population into a breast cancer study: Breast Cancer Risk Model for the Pacific.

Authors:  Rachael T Leon Guerrero; Grazyna Badowski; Alisha Yamanaka; Michelle Blas-Laguana; Renata Bordallo; Arielle Buyum; Lynne Wilkens; Rachel Novotny
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-10

4.  Recruitment of representative samples for low incidence cancer populations: do registries deliver?

Authors:  Tara Clinton-McHarg; Mariko Carey; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Elizabeth Tracey
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 5.  Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen A Stepan; Amy P Gonzalez; Vivian S Dorsey; Debra K Frye; Nita D Pyle; Regina F Smith; Terry A Throckmorton; Louise A Villejo; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Robert S Sandler; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries.

Authors:  T G Smith; M E Dunn; K Y Levin; S P Tsakraklides; S A Mitchell; L V van de Poll-Franse; K C Ward; C L Wiggins; X C Wu; M Hurlbert; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Predictors of Response Outcomes for Research Recruitment Through a Central Cancer Registry: Evidence From 17 Recruitment Efforts for Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Morgan M Millar; Anita Y Kinney; Nicola J Camp; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Mia Hashibe; David F Penson; Anne C Kirchhoff; Deborah W Neklason; Alicia W Gilsenan; Gretchen S Dieck; Antoinette M Stroup; Sandra L Edwards; Carrie Bateman; Marjorie E Carter; Carol Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Recruitment of a Population-Based Sample of Young Black Women with Breast Cancer through a State Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Devon Bonner; Deborah Cragun; Monique Reynolds; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.