Literature DB >> 16569151

Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: the role of mediator retrieval.

Gordon D Logan1, Darryl W Schneider.   

Abstract

In 3 experiments the role of mediators in task switching with transparent and nontransparent cues was examined. Subjects switched between magnitude (greater or less than 5) and parity (odd or even) judgments of single digits. A cue-target congruency effect indicated mediator use: subjects responded faster to congruent cue-target combinations (e.g., ODD-3) than to incongruent cue-target combinations (e.g., ODD-4). Experiment 1 revealed significant congruency effects with transparent word cues (ODD, EVEN, HIGH, and LOW) and with relatively transparent letter cues (O, E, H, and L) but not with nontransparent letter cues (D, V, G, and W). Experiment 2 revealed significant congruency effects after subjects who were trained with nontransparent letter cues were informed of the relations between cues and word mediators halfway through the experiment. Experiment 3 showed that congruency effects with relatively transparent letter cues diminished over 10 sessions of practice, suggesting that subjects used mediators less as practice progressed. The results are discussed in terms of the role of mediators in interpreting instructional cues.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16569151     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

3.  Learning a nonmediated route for response selection in task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

4.  The representational locus of spatial influence on backward inhibition.

Authors:  Katherine D Arbuthnott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

5.  Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?

Authors:  James A Grange; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-09

6.  Verbal representation in task order control: an examination with transition and task cues in random task switching.

Authors:  Erina Saeki; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

7.  Automaticity without extensive training: the role of memory retrieval in implementation of task-defined rules.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

8.  Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-27

9.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.